more on NOT ] Illegal tactics in getting to voters

David Farber <[email protected]> Mon, 20 Nov 2006 13:34:32 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.culture.people.interesting-people
Message-ID <[email protected]>

Begin forwarded message:

From: Seth Breidbart <[email protected]>
Date: November 7, 2006 4:45:57 PM EST
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [IP] more on NOT ] Illegal tactics in getting to voters

Paul Levy <[email protected]> wrote:

> do the FTC's rules apply to purely political speech?  I rather doubt
> it, and I doubt that they would be constitutional to the extent that
> they did

Content-independent rules are Constitutional.  For instance, amplified
sound trucks are illegal (based on decibel level), it doesn't matter
whether they're advertising political candidates or ice cream.

Likewise, rules about "Don't lie on CLID" and "Caller must release the
line when callee hangs up" (passed when someone died because an
auto-caller held the line and he couldn't call 911) and "Multiple
calls to someone who doesn't want them is harassment" are
Constitutional, because they have nothing to do with the content of
the calls.

Seth