more on NOT ] Illegal tactics in getting to voters
David Farber <[email protected]> Mon, 20 Nov 2006 13:34:32 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.people.interesting-people |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Begin forwarded message: From: Seth Breidbart <[email protected]> Date: November 7, 2006 4:45:57 PM EST To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [IP] more on NOT ] Illegal tactics in getting to voters Paul Levy <[email protected]> wrote: > do the FTC's rules apply to purely political speech? I rather doubt > it, and I doubt that they would be constitutional to the extent that > they did Content-independent rules are Constitutional. For instance, amplified sound trucks are illegal (based on decibel level), it doesn't matter whether they're advertising political candidates or ice cream. Likewise, rules about "Don't lie on CLID" and "Caller must release the line when callee hangs up" (passed when someone died because an auto-caller held the line and he couldn't call 911) and "Multiple calls to someone who doesn't want them is harassment" are Constitutional, because they have nothing to do with the content of the calls. Seth