Re: Smalltalk performance and Moore's Law

"andrew cooke" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.culture.people.kragen.discuss
Message-ID <25395.127.0.0.1.1173093029.squirrel@localhost>
a similar point is made here -
http://www.transhumanist.com/volume1/moravec.htm

scroll down to the third diagram, which has the caption:

  The big freeze. From 1960 to 1990 the cost of computers used in AI
  research declined, as their numbers dilution absorbed computer-
  efficiency gains during the period, and the power available to
  individual AI programs remained almost unchanged at 1 MIPS, barely
  insect power. AI computer cost bottomed in 1990, and since then power
  has doubled yearly, to several hundred MIPS by 1998.

andrew

[...]
> But Moore's Law is about price-performance, not absolute performance;
> here I estimate that the actual loss of price-performance attributable
> to bad CPU architectures is perhaps a factor of 10 to 50, and it is
> plausible that better compilers can remedy this.
[...]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.