Re: [External] : Re: Is this a dumb question?

Add physical cryptographic tokens and you have .mil or eop.gov =

basically.

On 2021-03-18 06:58, Gregory Alan Bolcer wrote:
> I'm guessing it'd be verticalized task specific access rather than
> geographic.  As there would be so many of them, there'd be no reason
> to only think of access at the big granular level.
> =

> Different virtualinterwebs could have different terms of service for
> using them including use and types of software, apps, content, QoS,
> etc.  If you don't obey the ToS then your next little emphemeral,
> contemporaneously generated crypto access is not renewed.
> =

> Greg
> =

> On 3/10/2021 9:48 PM, Reza B'Far wrote:
>> Interesting... so, how would that work in practice from Nation/State
>> sponsored attacks?=A0 As in where would you restrict things? You would
>> restrict, say *.cn?
>> =

>> I like Network/Hardware solutions over software solutions because they
>> erect physical barriers that have a much higher cost.=A0 Bunch of dudes =

>> in
>> a basement can't access satellites or subterranean cables (well, not
>> easily and at low cost).=A0 I think you could really fight things like
>> IP-theft which seem to be a big focus of the recent attacks by just
>> "cutting off" the hose.
>> =

>> On 3/10/21 3:45 PM, Gregory Alan Bolcer wrote:
>>> I like the idea of having a gTLD that you can only get on with =

>>> proper,
>>> time based, ephemeral certificates.
>>> =

>>> Greg
>>> =

>>> On 3/8/2021 11:21 AM, Reza B'Far wrote:
>>>> Reading the details of the Chinese attack... and the Russian =

>>>> attack...
>>>> =

>>>> Why would the western world not just go to a model where bit hoses =

>>>> of
>>>> internet are closed to those countries?=A0 I mean, I understand there =

>>>> is
>>>> really no effective way of "cutting off" networks globally... but =

>>>> there
>>>> are ways to basically restrict bandwidth and that would really =

>>>> create
>>>> problems for those countries.=A0 Why would we not do that?=A0 Like why =

>>>> would
>>>> NATO for example have a wing that can just limit the bandwidth to a
>>>> point where it becomes very "expensive" to mount large attacks?
>>>> =

>>>> =

>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> FoRK mailing list
>>>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork__;!!=
GqivPVa7Brio!MpcwtB_41r7tNYNgvsLt6a3mXDs4TEKQbhPI3FT_ZFW1xhUBzLTc-ziNgD2WXU=
oR$
>>>> =

>>> _______________________________________________
>>> FoRK mailing list
>>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork__;!!G=
qivPVa7Brio!MpcwtB_41r7tNYNgvsLt6a3mXDs4TEKQbhPI3FT_ZFW1xhUBzLTc-ziNgD2WXUo=
R$
>> =

>> =

>> _______________________________________________
>> FoRK mailing list
>> http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork
>> =

> _______________________________________________
> FoRK mailing list
> http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork
_______________________________________________
FoRK mailing list
http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork