RE: Re: Hole in the wall... looking at othe r issues (fwd)
Frederick Noronha <[email protected]> Thu, 31 Oct 2002 11:49:37 +0530 (IST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.publications.bytesforall.readers |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
More on the Hole-in-The-Wall. Parimala, please join the BytesForAll-READERS list on www.sarai.net. FN On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Parimala Inamdar wrote: > Just a couple more thoughts on this hotly debated topic. > > Experiments such as Hole In The Wall also seek to prove a hypothesis at a > mass level, not at an individual one. Therefore anecdotal stories of > individual successes of Indians abroad, while interesting, don't go further > towards building alternative strategies for education. > > To my mind, experiments such as Hole in the Wall also seek to research the > fact that subjects that are assumed to need "teaching" by a formal system > and hence require considerable resource deployment, may in fact be "learned" > by children if given adequate access and minimal intervention. That an > alternative "learning system" may be emerging to bridge the digital divide. > Its not merely about putting a computer in the middle of the road. > > We are in fact discussing children in disadvantaged areas where 1 or 2 year > olds do not have nintendo at home... and of how group learning happens in > that context. Simply put the experiment, I guess, seeks to make access > available to them and observe what and how they learn and if the results are > replicable and predictable. > > It should impact the future of the design of learning systems > > regards, > > Parimala Inamdar > The Design Lab > Center for Research In Cognitive Systems, NIIT Ltd > Corduroy Building, Aditya Textile Mills Compound > Safed Pool, Andheri East > Mumbai, India > ph:91-22-8513514/16/18 > fax: 91-22-8513504 > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Sugata Mitra > > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 3:29 PM > > To: Frederick Noronha; Joel Alma Brink; Ritu Dangwal; Parimala Inamdar > > Cc: Layton Montgomery > > Subject: RE: [Bytesforall_Readers] Re: Hole in the wall... looking at > > other issues (fwd) > > > > Thanks for a clear explanation. I do hope the issues are adequately > > addressed now. > > > > Regards, > > > > Sugata Mitra > > Centre for Research in Cognitive Systems > > Synergy Building > > IIT Campus > > Haus Khas > > New Delhi 110 016 > > India > > If you must speak or fax: > > Telephone: +91 11 658 1022 direct, 658 1017-20 ext 7001 > > Fax: +91 11 658 1022/23 > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Frederick Noronha [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 1:27 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Cc: Layton Montgomery > > Subject: Re: [Bytesforall_Readers] Re: Hole in the wall... looking at > > other issues (fwd) > > > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > > > Dear Satish et al, > > > > I have read bits and pieces about Hole-in-the-Wall, including some of > > the stuff on their website. > > > > > however, point is made- that kids in 6 to 13 age group can learn to > > > navigate a compter without anyone's help. but if kids from 2 or 3 > > > onwards can do it without manual because they could not read anyway, > > > what is the gain in proving that point. we presume if something can be > > > done by grade 1 students, grade 3 students can do that anyway. if not > > > there may be other issues involved. > > > > I am from an education background, having been a teacher in government > > schools (amongst other positions in education) in Southern Africa, South > > Asia, Eastern Europe, the US, and Australia. I think the point here is > > not just to show that it is possible, but to explore how it works, under > > what circumstances, for what types of knowledge, etc, and finally how to > > incorporate it into education systems. The original hole in the wall > > had significant monitoring to explore these questions. As a result of > > analysis of this data, modifications were made to the computer interface > > they used to increase the accessibility of the computer. > > > > Still, I remember thinking at that time that, just because it worked in > > a poor urban setting, that did not necessarily mean it would work in > > rural areas. The work in Maharastra has proven that to be the case as > > well. > > > > > i am also sensitive to it because it sounds a little racist to me that > > > what the kids in industrial world can do at age 3 the kids in slums > > > can do at 6 to 13. I have found some of the children who beg on the > > > streets of delhi extraordinarily intelligent in several cases but with > > > a lack of opportunities they may not achieve their potential. but does > > > that need to be proved. intelligence is almost evenly distributed > > > across all societies. it is its application, the learning curve that > > > we are on, the experiences we have, the culture we live in may shape > > > many of our preferences. > > > > I thoroughly and emphatically agree with all your points here, except > > the questioning of the need to prove it. I have not come across any > > such claims, and would like to hear from you where or by whom such > > claims were made. Funding decisions are very political, and whatever > > studies supporters of these points have access to, the stronger their > > case for funding initiatives that give access to all levels of learning > > to disadvantaged youths. There was a popular film in the US about 15 > > years ago based on a true story about a teacher in a poor inner city > > school called "Stand and Deliver". He insisted on teaching calculus to > > some of his students. He encountered opposition from other teachers and > > school administrators. After a few years, the students were doing so > > well that officials from the Educational Testing Service (ETS) believed > > that they must have been cheating. They did not believe that students > > from a poor inner city background could do as well as students from > > elite private schools. The students were forced to retake the exam > > under ETS supervision, and they proved that they had not cheated, and > > their scores were reinstated. > > > > > i am a child of deprivation myself and after getting an opportunity to > > > go to school i went to harvard, fletcher, and half a dozen schools in > > > the western world. i perhaps was the youngest editor and heda of a > > > newsweekly in the national press in india at under 30 years. but if > > > someone carried out an experiment saying that a child of deprivation > > > could become the editor of the times of india group at under 30 > > > therefore......... will that prove anything? > > > > Films such as "Stand and Deliver" and projects such as the > > Hole-in-the-Wall experiment help to emphasize that students from > > disadvantaged backgrounds have just as much potential as anybody else, > > and that, given the right context, they can excel. They will continue > > to be needed until the disadvantages are eliminated. Those who benefit > > from the inequalities will continue to try to maintain the social > > structures that give them an advantage, and many from disadvantaged > > backgrounds will continue to believe that there is no sense in even > > trying to overcome existing obstacles. I believe that both challenging > > the perspectives of people from advantaged backgrounds and giving hope > > and methods for overcoming obstacles to those from disadvantaged > > backgrounds are equally necessary. From what you say, you have managed > > to overcome the odds, and so your insights would be useful to both > > groups. > > > > > where i have an issue is in turning that into a model that will route > > > funds into a direction that may not be necessary. that is expensive. > > > or not cost-effective. each point has its purpose and helps us move > > > forward as a society. but i have an issue when it directs resources in > > > a direction that may require greater scrutiny. even more so when the > > > resiurces are public. > > > > I see the Hole-in-the-Wall experiment as worthwhile research from both > > an education standpoint and a social change standpoint. I do not know > > about the significant funding you object to, and from what I have read, > > they are doing more than simply putting computers in different places > > and watching. Also, from a scientific standpoint, the more widely an > > experimental result is verified, the more it is taken to be valid. > > Nevertheless, your point about prioritising funding initiatives is well > > taken. I would be interested in hearing more specifics about where you > > see money within the project being used for unnecessary duplication. > > > > > i get upset when someone like the ceo of globalvision - at the > > > strength of the argument provided by one of our own colleagues- comes > > > and tells me in an email that 15 year old indian kids could be less > > > intelligent than 3 year old american kids. when i know well that his > > > asosciate is a child adopted from bihar and brought up in italy and > > > now has an italian name. for me he is proof enough that we do not need > > > to prove these points anymore. there was a hollywood film with dan > > > arkroyd and eddie murphy- for one dollar or something- where the point > > > was proved for masses. i thought that should have closed the issue. > > > the point is about how we can better use of technology not about they > > > can also learn it and the others can also learn it > > > > I fully agree with you that such statements are upsetting, to say the > > least. For you or me the associate may be proof enough, but we are not > > the only ones who needs convincing. Obviously this CEO has not made the > > connection even though he is the one with the associate you use as an > > example. Also, the movie, "Trading Places", was pure fiction, and so > > cannot be said to prove anything, really. The premise was so outrageous > > that people from both privileged and disadvantaged backgrounds in the US > > would view it as little more than humorous fantasy. Thus it would not > > give a sense of hope to anybody. It would also not challenge anybody's > > worldview or show anybody how to improve their situation. In fact, > > achieving success purely by a chance encounter with 2 crazy rich stock > > brokers would only add to a sense of fatalism that assumes that success > > has nothing to do with ability or effort, and everything to do with just > > being in the right place at the right time. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Layton Montgomery > > > > > > > > > > http://careers.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Careers > > - 1,000's of jobs waiting online for you! > > > NIIT Software Solutions bags "Outsourcing Contract of the Year" award from > the Financial Times publication, The Banker. For details visit our website > http://www.niit.com > ___________________NOTICE____________________________ > This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information intended > only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure > by any other person is strictly prohibited. If you received this > transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and then > destroy the message. Opinions, conclusions, and other information in this > message that do not relate to the official business of NIIT shall be > understood to be neither given nor endorsed by NIIT When addressed to NIIT > clients, any information contained in this e-mail is subject to the terms > and conditions in the governing client contract. >