[CAnet - news] Excellent report on desktop video conferencing- telephony
"Bill St.Arnaud" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.publications.news |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <004201c61c63$bb631250$7a02a8c0@amarillo> |
For more information on this item please visit the CANARIE CA*net 4 Optical Internet program web site at http://www.canarie.ca/canet4/library/list.html ------------------------------------------- [Thanks to Dirk van der Woude for this pointer -- BSA] Hi, You might be interested in the attached report on video telephony: what does it take to have it universally available. We asked Eem Valley's Paul Sijben to evaluate all aspects, including a detailed technical review of available hardware at consumer price level. A few 'secrets' of today's webcams are revealed. An approach is identified that will VHS-like quality at a symmetrical bandwidth of 5-10Mb/. Below is the Executive Summary. The report is archived on the Citynet site at: www.citynet.nl/upload/What-does-it-take-to-get-good-videotelephony.pdf greetings, Dirk ================================ Video telephony is one of the most appealing possibilities promised by broadband Internet. There are huge advantages to being in a telephone call and being able to see the other person. As has been known for quite some time, the nuances of face, body and arm gestures add a wealth of information to communication. Good video telephony adds quality to telecommunica-tion that reduces the need for people to physically travel to meetings. Good video telephony can prevent the elderly and less mobile from becoming isolated. For video telephony to be widely accepted it needs to be easy to use, provide sufficient quality and be affordable. Unfortunately good video telephony is not universally available. Today, video telephony usually implies that a group of people gather around a table and watch a TV showing a similar group of people around another table. Personal video telephony usually means watching postage stamp sized people in a PC screen, whose image is refreshed occasionally. In this report we address the question; when a country like the Netherlands is 2nd in the world in broadband penetration and if video telephony is one of the most appealing broadband applications, why is good video telephony so hard to come by? Many of today's videophones are difficult to use or privacy invasive. Adding a traditional receiver and some buttons familiar from regular telephones may address both of these issues. For a usability standpoint we would like to see the videophone as a standalone device with a telephone-like handset. A few buttons will allow de caller to "dial" the called and a simple button will allow calls to be accepted and terminated. A few buttons for starting and stopping the video streams and to mute the sound will enable an affordable videophone for anyone who can handle a regular telephone. In this report we have shown that the state of the art is mostly determined by bandwidth limitations. However, broadband Internet is making huge strides forward. The introduction of symmetrical Internet with high guaranteed speeds offers opportunities for video telephony, finally there is the opportunity for good image quality at acceptable costs. The approach identified in this report will work with symmetrical bandwidth of 5-10Mb/s and will deliver an image quality comparable to that of VHS video with acceptable delays. If there is the will and the bandwidth, nothing will stand in the way of general use of video te- Table of Contents Executive Summary..............3 About the Author.................5 Table of Contents.................7 1 Introduction.................9 1.1 Existing video telephony applications.......................9 1.1.1 MSN Messenger....................9 1.1.2 D-link DVC-1000..................10 1.1.3 D-link DVC-2000..................11 1.1.4 Polycom V500.....................11 1.2 Video telephony and bandwidth..11 1.3 Issues with video telephony today .12 2 Properties of good video telephony.....13 2.1 Introduction........13 2.2 Image quality.....13 2.3 Usability.............14 2.3.1 Professional use...................14 2.3.2 Private use..15 2.3.3 Domestic Privacy..................15 2.3.4 User requirements................16 3 Anatomy of video telephony...............17 3.1 Introduction........17 3.2 Bandwidth..........17 3.3 Delay.................19 3.3.1 Delay at capture..................20 3.3.2 Network delay.....................20 3.3.3 Delays in processing the video.......21 3.4 Streaming..........21 4 Towards good video telephony...........23 4.1 Introduction........23 4.2 Unlimited bandwidth....................23 4.3 Conclusion.........23 Annex A Camera Measurement..................25 A.1 Introduction........25 A.2 Test setting.........25 A.3 Base measurement.......................25 A.4 The secrets behind webcams........26 A.5 Improving webcam behavior.......27 A.6 New technology; not faster..........27 ------------------------------------- To SUBSCRIBE: send a blank e-mail message to [email protected] To UNSUBSCRIBE: send a blank email message to [email protected] ------------------------------------- These news items and comments are mine alone and do not necessarily reflect those of the CANARIE board or management. ----------- [email protected] www.canarie.ca/~bstarn skype: pocketpro SkypeIn: +1 614 441-9603 _______________________________________________ news mailing list [email protected] http://lists.canarie.ca/mailman/listinfo/news