[CAnet - news] Open Source TV and Telcom
"Bill St.Arnaud" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.publications.news |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <000501c63ae8$02265c90$6401a8c0@amarillo> |
For more information on this item please visit the CANARIE CA*net 4 Optical Internet program web site at http://www.canarie.ca/canet4/library/list.html ------------------------------------------- [Here is a couple of posts from Dave Farber's IPer list discussing some interesting new trends in the open source movement. Some excerpts -- BSA] http://gigaom.com/2006/02/23/here-comes-open-source-telecom/ While open source software movement has ravaged the bottom lines of companies like Sun Microsystems; networking behemoths like Cisco and Juniper have continued to enjoy fat margins they earned even before the telecom crash of 2000. Even today, a big portion of their IT budget goes into networking gear. Routers, switches, firewall devices, and even VPN boxes cost thousands of dollars. The scramble for open source in networking comes because two primal forces tearing the old telecom order apart. First, the Internet-based technologies are replacing the closed legacy phone systems, thus helping the convergence of computer and the phone systems. In old times, in order to build a networking box, companies would design specialized chips, and run specialized software on them to get the best performance. Now you can buy extremely powerful processors like Advanced Micro Devices' Opteron chips for a few hundred dollars, run special networking software on them, and get similar performance. There are nearly half-a-dozen open source projects that capitalize on the cheap processing power. -------------------- Following up on the idea of "Open Source Telecom" we can think about open source TV. I saw a piece in the NYT today about a new show "Kappa Mikey" (http://www.animationcollective.com/news/news02062006.htm) from The Animation Collective. What makes it interesting is that it is done in Flash. Doing animation in Flash is nothing new nor is the idea of simplified production (as with South Park or even Clutch Cargo nearly half a century ago). Flash content doesn't take much network capacity because it is coded mostly as objects. It avoids the whole the need to compress - it is a compressed format. What is strange is rendering it as video at the head end and then recompressing it as MPEG2 (or MPEG4) for transmission and then doing an analog decompression. This destroys the integrity of the content (AKA signal). This is not just about bypass, this is about simply getting the real signal through. It's a scenario that is far worse for the broadcasters than bypass because it is changing the rules in a way that makes the paths they control a liability not an asset. Bob Frankston ------------------------------------- To SUBSCRIBE: send a blank e-mail message to [email protected] To UNSUBSCRIBE: send a blank email message to [email protected] ------------------------------------- These news items and comments are mine alone and do not necessarily reflect those of the CANARIE board or management. ----------- [email protected] www.canarie.ca/~bstarn skype: pocketpro SkypeIn: +1 614 441-9603 _______________________________________________ news mailing list [email protected] http://lists.canarie.ca/mailman/listinfo/news