[CAnet - news] Some European telcos encourage municipal FTTx projects
"Bill St.Arnaud" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.publications.news |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <00a201c6dcc3$45fbc860$1400000a@amarillo> |
[An excellent overview and comparison of FTTx developments in Europe versus the US. One comment that caught my attention is that because of the regulatory environment in Europe "some European incumbents actually encourage municipalities to build out FTTH networks because it is less expensive for them to lease capacity on that network rather than build out their own...". Ultimately I think this a solution that North American telcos are going to have to adopt as well, if they want to have any hope of competing against the MSOs. The MSOs are holding all the aces with respect to broadband in North America. And the costs for the telcos to build out their own competitive broadband infrastructure will be astronomic. Verizon which is deploying its own fiber network will only reach 40% of the homes at best. It is also an open question whether there is a business case in the residential market for two suppliers of commodity broadband IP. Some excerpts from Lightwave article --BSA] http://lw.pennnet.com/Articles/Article_Display.cfm?Section=ARTCL&ARTICLE_ID= 271114&VERSION_NUM=2&p=13&dcmp=FTTXNews European municipalities lead FTTH charge According to a recent KMI Research (www.kmiresearch.com) report, FTTH deployments will compose 65% of Europes fiber-optic market in 2010, with fiber-to-the-node, -building, or -basement (FTTN/B) composing the remaining 35%. However, unlike in the U.S. where the incumbent Verizon is leading the FTTH charge, the technology is experiencing greater traction among the European municipalities and municipal utilities, particularly in the Nordic and Benelux regions. In Scandinavia, in particular, there is broad government support, and the local utility companies and municipalities are very supportive of the desire to locally stimulate economic development,. One of the earliest FTTH implementations was Stokab (www.stokab.se), founded in 1994 by the City of Stockholm to promote economic growth and stimulate IT development in the region. The 1.2 million fiber-km network links all the municipalities in the county and greater Mälar region. According to Stokabs annual report, approximately 8,000 households were connected via fiber by the end of 2005. Stokab has served as a model for other municipalities in the Scandinavian region, many of which-like Stokab-are open access networks. An open access network is operator-neutral, supporting multiple service and content providers. The preponderance of open access networks has influenced technology choice among the European municipalities, many of which have opted for a point-to-point active Ethernet architecture. According to Robert Whitman, manager of global broadband market development at Corning (www.corning.com), a point-to-point architecture more easily facilitates the sharing of a network; each customer has a dedicated laser in the central office or some point in the field. While it is technically feasible to support an open access network via PON, the point-to-point architecture is far less complex, he says. Incumbents lagging behind The municipal FTTH market in Europe has taken off faster than the PTT market in part because there is little incentive for the incumbents to embark on such projects. European PTTs are not facing the same competitive pressure that the cable MSOs are putting on incumbent carriers in the U.S. Where you see strong competitive activity, thats where you see major, facilities-based build-outs of telecom networks, says Whitman. Finally, the regulatory environment in Europe is not favorable to the incumbents. They must share their infrastructure, making a return on investment more challenging. As a result, some European incumbents actually encourage municipalities to build out FTTH networks because it is less expensive for them to lease capacity on that network rather than build out their own, reports Whitman. European incumbent carriers are willing to ride other peoples networks to get to customers, he says, which is a very different mindset from the United States. Here, our cable companies and telcos are just not going to do that. ----------- [email protected] www.canarie.ca/~bstarn skype: pocketpro SkypeIn: +1 614 441-9603 _______________________________________________ news mailing list [email protected] http://lists.canarie.ca/mailman/listinfo/news