[CAnet - news] More on Platform Architect as a Network-centric Strategy
"Bill St.Arnaud" <[email protected]> Mon, 28 May 2007 09:52:47 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.publications.news |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <000001c7a12f$79b26de0$0421bdcd@amarillo> |
For more information on this item please visit my blog at http://billstarnaud.blogspot.com/ ------------------------------------------- [More comments From David Reed on platform architects -- BSA Interesting. But it's mostly been said before, quite coherently - read the book by Annabelle Gawer and Michael Cusumano entitled Platform Leadership, from Harvard Business School Press. As vp and chief scientist at Lotus, I was lucky to be involved directly in most of the cases discussed in that book - Intel, for example, early recognized that its value proposition was intimately entangled with a network of other companies, many of whom were linked only indirectly to Intel (e.g. Lotus, which had *zero* customer or supplier contracts with Intel, and little need to talk to them). Thus taking a leadership role in shaping that network's evolution was going to be crucial, and Intel stepped into the role - very actively working with people with responsibilities like mine in distant parts of the network to define the evolution of the PC platform. (e.g. Intel led a variety of software architecture standards efforts that increased the success of PC's their OS's and their applications - often acting as Switzerland between tensely competing companies that also had to cooperate - IBM and Compaq, Lotus and MicrosoftApplications). This contrasted directly with Apple's very constrained notion of a vertically integrated stack, and no network to speak of (if you also did apps or hadrware for PCs, Apple basically told you, e.g. us at Lotus, to go to hell, presuming that they could dictate their platform's direction alone). The failure to grasp that one's platform was embedded in a network of relationships that had non-trivial network effects was a failing strategy, over the long run. IMO, it explains a lot of what has happened in the computing industry. It's not a full explanation, but ignore it at your peril. That said, the more macho and self-centered CEOs and management teams ignore it all the time. The more the CEO (or POTUS, for that matter) is surrounded by glorifying sycophants, the more likely the value of the network is discounted by that person. This, by the way, is part of where the inspiration for Reed's Law came from. ------------------------------------- To SUBSCRIBE: send a blank e-mail message to [email protected] To UNSUBSCRIBE: send a blank email message to [email protected] ------------------------------------- These news items and comments are mine alone and do not necessarily reflect those of the CANARIE board or management. [email protected] [email protected] www.canarie.ca/~bstarn skype: pocketpro SkypeIn: +1 614 441-9603 _______________________________________________ news mailing list [email protected] http://lists.canarie.ca/mailman/listinfo/news