[CAnet - news] New Internet architectures to reduce carbon emissions

For more information on this item please visit my blog at 
http://green-broadband.blogspot.com/ or http://billstarnaud.blogspot.com
-------------------------------------------

 [This is another posting as part of my own evolving thought processes how
the Internet, and in particular research and education networks can help
reduce carbon dioxide emissions, firstly by re-engineering the network and
secondly by deploying applications and services that will encourage others
to use the Internet in novel ways in order to minimize their own carbon
footprint.

First of all I would like to thank all those people who sent me e-mails with
additional suggestions, comments and ideas on how ICT technologies, in
particular the Internet and broadband can be used to mitigate the impact of
global warming. Given the large number of e-mails I have received on the
subject I apologize if I have not been able to reply to some of you
directly.

I want to assure you that none of my ideas, and those of others that have
been posted here, are in any way cast in stone or anywhere close to
deployment. Many of these ideas are come from my own fevered brain, and may
likely never survive close scrutiny by experts or validation in the
marketplace.  The purpose of this e-mail and my blog is to hopefully
stimulate some creative thinking in the Internet community and especially
within R&E networks on ways we can collectively design "green" Internet
solutions. This is a community that is used to rapid changes and has many of
the most innovative people in business or academia. Hopefully my blog, in
some small way, will stimulate others in developing more robust and scalable
solutions that help address, what in my opinion, is the biggest challenge of
this generation and of this decade - global warming.


In today's modern Internet networks one of the biggest energy sinks, and
consequently a significant producer of carbon emission due to their
electrical and cooling requirement, is the Internet core routers.

Internet routers are custom designed pieces of computing equipment which
must operate at very high speeds in order to do fast lookups in the
forwarding table in order to process packets at line speeds.  The need to do
fast lookups is further compounded by the continued growth of routing tables
over the past few years.

In order to handle the processing of packets at wire line speeds modern
routers usually have multiple ASICs on the forwarding card. Each ASIC
handles only a subset of the forwarding address table, which is split up
between the various ASICs on /8, /16 (or finer grained) address boundaries.

But an alternate routing architecture approach to big core routers with
multiple ASICs is to deploy networks of multiple virtual routers, with each
network of virtual routers assigned an address block. All virtual routers
for a given address block linked together by a dedicated lightpath network
independent of parallel virtual routers and networks for other address
blocks. 

Each address range or block would have a global set of virtual routers
dedicated to forwarding and routing with that address block.  And optical
connections between the virtual routers can be traffic engineered to
optimize flows for that address block. As well separate OSPF (or ISIS)
networks can be deployed for each  address block.  At inter-domain
boundaries these separate address block networks can be aggregated into a
single connection to a neighbouring AS, or arrangements can be made to
advertise separate BGP networks with parallel ASs for each address block
network.

At first blush this seems to be an incredible waste of resources. Not only
would separate routing tables and networks would have to be maintained, but
multiple copies of filtering policies etc would have to be deployed for each
network address block.

However by breaking up the forwarding table into multiple (roughly) parallel
forwarding networks, where each network is assigned a specific address block
allows us to deploy much more inexpensive commoditized routers using off the
shelf open source routing engines like Vyatta.

Because these routers don't have to do lookups on the entire forwarding
table they can be built with more inexpensive commodity components. In
effect we are trading off large forwarding tables using ASICs against
commodity virtual routers with multiple parallel optical networks for each
address block.

More importantly these low cost (and low energy, hence low carbon emission)
devices can now be collocated nearby renewable energy sites. Not all such
sites need to have to support all virtual routers to carry the entire
routing table. Instead address block networks can be engineered with
different topologies linking together independent  renewable energy sites
supporting alternate nodes for the various address block networks.

Because we have also broken down the Internet into many (roughly) parallel
networks aligned along each address block, outages and re-routing can be
more easily handled, especially as the routing nodes are located at
renewable energy sites such as windmills and solar power farms.

Users would be backhauled to with dedicated optical links to two or more
virtual router renewable energy sites. The assumption is that an all optical
backhaul network has much lower carbon emissions than an energy consuming
electronic local router or stat-mux switch.

This architecture would be ideal for R&E networks as generally they have a
very small number of directly connected organizations such as universities
and research centers. These organizations can even pre-classify their
outgoing packets along the address block boundaries and send them out
separate parallel optical channels to the nearest renewable energy site(s)
supporting the multiple virtual routers for each address block.

Companies like Google are also well positioned to take advantage of this
architecture as they have a world wide distributed network of low cost
servers and they are rumored to be deploying costumed developed 10Gbe
switches on their own private optical network. The same principles that
Google used for their network of search engines could be applied to a
virtual routed network as described here.

Optical networks are much better suited for this application as opposed to
MPLS and PBT networks which require electronic devices to do the forwarding
and label switching.  Optical networks can be significantly more energy
efficient than electronic networks, but unquestionably far less efficient in
terms of multiplexing packets. Tools like Inocybe's Argia can be used to do
the traffic engineering of the various optical paths assigned to each
address block.

For more information on this architectural concepts please see my blog or
presentations at http://green-broadband.blogspot.com
 

-------------------------------------
To SUBSCRIBE:
send a blank e-mail message to
[email protected]

To UNSUBSCRIBE:
send a blank email message to
[email protected]
-------------------------------------

These news items and comments are mine alone and do not necessarily reflect
those  of the CANARIE board or management.
-----------
[email protected]
[email protected]
web: www.canarie.ca/~bstarn
skype: pocketpro
blog: http://billstarnaud.blogspot.com/


_______________________________________________
news mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.canarie.ca/mailman/listinfo/news