The Straight Dope 07/09/2004
[email protected] Fri, 09 Jul 2004 04:00:02 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.publications.straight-dope |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <LISTMANAGER-2907760-61749-2004.07.09-04.00.03--gcps-straightdope-list#[email protected]> |
The Straight Dope -- By Cecil Adams http://www.straightdope.com You are subscribed as: [[email protected]] To unsubscribe CLICK on the URL below this line: mailto:[email protected] If you can't "click" above, then send a blank email to: [email protected] ____________________________________________ THE STRAIGHT DOPE 07/09/2004 Dear Cecil: What is the story with human growth hormone (HGH)? I know that the actual hormone can be injected (at great expense), and some of the Hollywood crowd supposedly use this to stay young. However, a lot of companies are marketing "HGH enhancers," which are not HGH but supplements that are supposed to stimulate the body to produce HGH in greater quantities. The enhancers are much less expensive than actual HGH and supposedly almost as effective in raising your HGH level. So, does HGH really restore your youth? Do these HGH enhancers work? Or is it all placebo effect? -- Richard Nash, via e-mail ~~~~~~ Looking for the perfect gift for that wedding, birthday, or bar mitzvah? Straight Dope books are the very thing! See http://www.straightdope.com/store.html ~~~~~~ Cecil replies: Chances are you're going to be hearing a lot about HGH in the next few years. Consider the following facts: (1) he most promising test done on HGH so far involved men age 60 and up. (2) The leading edge of the baby-boom generation is now 58. If you're, say, Bill Clinton, born in 1946, you're looking in the mirror and thinking: You know, for an old fart, I don't look bad. How long can I hold off the inevitable? (3) Most of the crap you see touting HGH and so-called HGH enhancers is, in fact, crap. (4) However, some of it's not. Here's the story so far. . . For more, see: http://www.straightdope.com/columns/040709.html STAFF REPORT Dear Straight Dope: When reading a safety flier recently, I came across a gem I had not heard before: "Store charcoal in a dry place and prevent it from getting moist or wet (wet charcoal can self- ignite by spontaneous ignition)." What's the deal? True or not?--Bryan Salas SDSTAFF Una replies: At first I didn't want to take this question, since like Hank Hill I grill only with propane so I can "taste the meat, not the heat." However, since I'm the Straight Dope's resident Coal Goddess, Cecil ordered me to put aside my prejudices and answer this one for him. So here we are. Short answer: The chances of that bag of charcoal you bought at the Kroger spontaneously catching fire are low--but that's not to say you should ignore the safety warning. If you heaped up enough of the stuff and got it wet. . . For more, see: http://www.straightdope.com/columns/040709.html STRAIGHT DOPE CLASSIC - 11/28/1986 Dear Cecil: What happened to the brontosaurus? Number-one son (preliterate) recently acquired a major case of dinosaur love, so I've been spending a lot of time lately reading about prehistoric life in books with large type, lotsa pictures, and a sketchy sense of detail. In the course of this I've noticed there's something cooking with my favorite sauropod. There seem to be three possibilities: (1) The brontosaurus has been renamed the apatosaurus. (2) The brontosaurus was never really called the brontosaurus; that was just its popular name, and the dinosaur establishment for unspecified reasons is now cracking down and insisting on the scientific name Apatosaurus ajax. (3) There was never any such thing as a brontosaurus; there was only the apatosaurus, but nobody knew it until recently. What's the truth? Does this have anything to do with the story I heard that all the heads on all the brontos in all the museums everywhere had to be knocked off some years ago and changed? --Clint P., Chicago Dear Clint: This is going to be a world-class bummer for all you Dino the Dinosaur fans out there, but it seems there's been a little mistake. A couple mistakes, actually. First, Othniel Charles Marsh, the distinguished paleontologist who discovered the so-called brontosaurus, somehow managed to get the heads mixed up. Second, what he thought was a new species in reality was just another specimen of a previously discovered lizard called the apatosaurus. Since the name that comes first gets priority, apatosaurus stayed, and brontosaurus got the hook. Thus, officially speaking, there is no such thing as a brontosaurus, and what's worse, what you thought was a brontosaurus actually doesn't look like what you thought it looked like. For more, see: http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a2_011.html ____________________________________________ Here's how you can get your OWN FREE Subscription: Send a blank mailto:[email protected] ____________________________________________ Copyright 1995 - 2004 Chicago Reader, Inc. All Rights Reserved You may forward this document by email ONLY if you include the entire document INCLUDING the information at the bottom of this publication ____________________________________________ Visit our good friends at Joke A Day http://www.jokeaday.com They're kind enough to mail THE STRAIGHT DOPE for us. Join the World's Largest Daily Humor List and receive daily laughs in your email by sending mailto:[email protected]