The Straight Dope 02/25/2005
[email protected] Fri, 25 Feb 2005 09:28:53 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.publications.straight-dope |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <LISTMANAGER-2907760-726401-2005.02.25-09.28.55--gcps-straightdope-list#[email protected]> |
The Straight Dope -- By Cecil Adams http://www.straightdope.com You are subscribed as: [[email protected]] To unsubscribe CLICK on the URL below this line: mailto:[email protected] If you can't "click" above, then send a blank email to: [email protected] ____________________________________________ THE STRAIGHT DOPE 02/25/2005 Dear Cecil: Ever since I was a kid the media have warned about not looking directly at a solar eclipse. The principal at our school would always keep us inside to avoid our burning out our retinas sneaking a peek. Are we all being fooled by an urban legend that keeps getting recirculated every time there's an eclipse? I've never seen a rash of stories after an eclipse about people being blinded or needing glasses because they couldn't resist the temptation to gaze. --Shub from Ottawa, Canada ~~~~~~ Looking for the perfect gift for that wedding, birthday, or bar mitzvah? Straight Dope books are the very thing! See http://www.straightdope.com/store.html ~~~~~~ Cecil replies: We'll get to this directly, but first an acknowledgment. Several times in recent weeks I've thanked Bibliophage of the Straight Dope Science Advisory Board for his aid in preparing these columns, and now must do so yet again. As one of the last generalists in an era of information overload, often I'll find an interesting letter in the Big Box o' Questions and think: Confound it, what did that little man from the Mayo Clinic call eye damage due to eclipse gazing? How gratifying to then find a note from Bibliophage in the margin: Cece, it's solar retinopathy. Right. To which one can only add that while the danger of looking at solar eclipses may be exaggerated, it's no urban legend. For more, see: http://www.straightdope.com/columns/050225.html STRAIGHT DOPE CLASSIC #1 - 04/12/1985 Dear Straight Dope: For the last several years, I've been dipping my lungs into a substance called nitrous oxide-- known to dentists as laughing gas, and on the street as whippets. In its most portable form, the gas is packed into handy single-serving cartridges, which are then discharged into a balloon or metal cannister, from which the gas is inhaled. What follows is ninety seconds of euphoria. As a clean-cut all-American boy, I know that anything this enjoyable must be harmful. But how--and how much? A friend showed me an article which listed four dangers: (1) damage to the brain from lack of oxygen; (2) damage to the lips from "freezer burn," caused by excessively cold equipment; (3) damage to the lungs from inhaling too much too soon; and (4) damage to the head from hitting it during a nirvanaesque blackout. The last three are trivial and easily avoidable (you'll have to take my word on this one, Cece), and the first seems insignificant--you don't go that long without oxygen in this experience. But my question remains. Two questions, actually. (1) How does the stuff work? (2) What's it doing that can't be undone? I don't use it that often, but I'd like to know how soon I can expect to start drooling down the front of my person. --J.B., Iowa City Cecil replies: Aren't we getting a little old for this, J.? At the rate some people are going, we won't know whether to attribute drooling to drugs or the onset of second childhood. You'll be interested to know there's a book called Nitrous Oxide (Edmond Eger, editor), which reveals the following facts: (1) Despite oodles of scientific experiments, they don't exactly know how nitrous oxide works. "The best surmise," it says here, "is that the gas acts indirectly, perhaps through a pain-inhibiting system in the spinal cord that releases a substance whose effect in turn inhibits a particular neurotransmitter required for pain-signal passage." Check. For more, see: http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a2_223b.html STRAIGHT DOPE CLASSIC #2 - 08/23/1985 Dear Cecil: Help me before my love life becomes even more messed up. When chocolate became a mini- craze not too long ago, I heard several times that "chocolate contains some of the same chemicals that the human brain produces when you're in love." First of all, O all-knowing one, is this true? And if so, what is the practical effect? Might shrewdly feeding it to my date increase my chances? Please let me know quickly; I've got a hot one lined up for Saturday night. --Tom R., Hollywood, California Dear Tom: So you figure this is the real story behind Hershey's kisses, huh? It all started a number of years ago with a theory proposed by two doctors at the New York State Psychiatric Institute, Donald F. Klein and Michael R. Liebowitz. They suggested that the brain of a person in love or otherwise feeling groovy contains large quantities of phenylethylamine, a chemical that supposedly produces an amphetaminelike high. Chocolate, it turns out, also contains a lot of phenylethylamine, so . . . For more, see: http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a2_227.html ____________________________________________ Here's how you can get your OWN FREE Subscription: Send a blank mailto:[email protected] ____________________________________________ Copyright 1995 - 2005 Chicago Reader, Inc. All Rights Reserved You may forward this document by email ONLY if you include the entire document INCLUDING the information at the bottom of this publication ____________________________________________ Visit our good friends at Joke A Day http://www.jokeaday.com They're kind enough to mail THE STRAIGHT DOPE for us. Join the World's Largest Daily Humor List and receive daily laughs in your email by sending mailto:[email protected]