The Straight Dope 04/01/2005
[email protected] Fri, 01 Apr 2005 04:00:00 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.publications.straight-dope |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <LISTMANAGER-2907760-808626-2005.04.01-04.00.02--gcps-straightdope-list#[email protected]> |
The Straight Dope -- By Cecil Adams http://www.straightdope.com You are subscribed as: [[email protected]] To unsubscribe CLICK on the URL below this line: mailto:[email protected] If you can't "click" above, then send a blank email to: [email protected] ____________________________________________ THE STRAIGHT DOPE 04/01/2005 Dear Cecil: I recently saw the movie The Magdalene Sisters on DVD. Here's the premise: For 150 years, ending in 1996, teenage girls in Ireland who got pregnant or raped or were so attractive it was assumed they would eventually become promiscuous were sent by their parents to prisonlike asylums run by the Catholic church. Nuns oversaw day-to-day operations. The girls were forced to work in laundries from dawn till dusk 364 days a year and were fed only gruel. The asylums were surrounded by high walls topped with broken glass and had locked gates and bars on the windows. Nuns stood guard at night to make sure no one escaped. Far from being released upon turning 21, these girls were imprisoned for life; in the words of the movie's mother superior, "I decide when or if you're allowed to leave." Thirty thousand women were locked up in these asylums over the years. I'm assuming even the Catholic church in Ireland wasn't exempt from laws against false imprisonment and the like, so these women had to know they were being held illegally. Despite the high walls and so on, it's hard to imagine a woman of, say, 35 having remained there since age 18 or 19 simply because she'd been physically prevented from leaving. Could a religious organization hold someone against her will decade after decade? Wouldn't the more determined eventually find a way out? The inmates outnumbered the nuns by a wide margin. It's not like the nuns were armed. What gives? --Mark Reynolds, Carol Stream, Illinois ~~~~~~ Looking for the perfect gift for that wedding, birthday, or bar mitzvah? Straight Dope books are the very thing! See http://www.straightdope.com/store.html ~~~~~~ Cecil replies: I hear you, bud. The common reaction to Peter Mullan's The Magdalene Sisters (2002), which depicts what amounts to a church-operated slave labor camp, is disbelief. You can imagine this kind of thing happening during Victorian times, but the movie is set in 1964. Was Ireland that wacky? Was the Catholic church? Sure looks that way. The scandal didn't break until 1993, and the full story has yet to be told, but here's what we know so far: For more, see: http://www.straightdope.com/columns/050401.html STAFF REPORT Dear Straight Dope: Can you deliver the straight dope on Mormonism? Do their claims hold water or not? Who wrote the Book of Mormon? --vanukoff Guest contributor Rico replies: First off, a disclaimer. I'm a former Mormon and a returned Mormon missionary, and consider myself well versed in the religion even though I am no longer a member. I'll attempt to present both sides as objectively as possible. We'll start with the version told by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (LDS), as the Mormon religion is formally known. The church's founder, Joseph Smith, was born in 1805 in Vermont. His father was an impoverished farmer, but his mother, Lucy Mack Smith, managed to instruct him in reading, writing, and the ground rules of arithmetic. After moving from Vermont around 1816, the Smiths first settled in the town (township) of Palmyra in Wayne county, western New York, and lived there about four years. Then they moved a few miles south of Palmyra village to the town of Farmington in Ontario county. The part of Farmington where they lived, called even then Manchester, has since become a separate town, still in Ontario county. Palmyra remained the nearest settlement of any size to their new home. In 1820, according to Smith, there was a great religious revival in his area. He couldn't decide which of the many sects was right, so after reading the biblical instruction that any who lacked wisdom should "ask of God" (James 1:5), he retired to a nearby grove to pray. While thus engaged he was visited by two personages who identified themselves as God the Father and Jesus Christ. They told him to not join any of the religions because "they were all wrong; and the Personage who addressed me said that all their creeds were an abomination in his sight; that those professors were all corrupt; that they draw near to me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me, they teach for doctrines the commandments of men, having a form of godliness, but they deny the power thereof" (Pearl of Great Price, Joseph Smith--History, 1:19). For more, see: http://www.straightdope.com/mailbag/mmormon.html STRAIGHT DOPE CLASSIC - 08/28/1987 Dear Cecil: Why is the New York borough of the Bronx not simply called "Bronx"? I've consulted encyclopedias, native New Yorkers, and even a linguist at a leading university. So far all I've gotten is a partial explanation. At the turn of the century when the five boroughs were consolidated into one city, the large parcel of land north of Manhattan was owned by a wealthy family named Broncks. When city dwellers wanted to escape suburbia, they went up to the Broncks farm or estate. Later the spelling was changed to Bronx. But I'm sure there's more to it than that. Cecil, if I don't get an answer by August 11, the Lord's gonna call me home. --Norman W., Chicago Dear Norm: I hope you like the Lord's digs better than your previous place of residence, Norm, because I'm a little late. You know you can't rush these things. You got a few facts scrambled on the Bronx story. The name of the wealthy family was Bronck (sometimes spelled Bronk). The clan's patriarch, Jonas, settled on 500 acres north of the Harlem River in 1639 and promptly affixed his surname to various features of the local geography, notably the Bronx River. As one of his descendants explained, "The termination of `x' merely indicates the possessive case. Instead of writing Bronk's River or Bronk's farm, the Dutch took the phonetic short cut and made `x' do duty for the fusion of `k' and `s'; extremely simple, and a space saver too. Thus, when Jonas impressed his own family nomenclature on the region he settled, the Aquahung River became Bronk's River--the Bronx, as it remains today, correctly expressed in Dutch." For more, see: http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a2_248.html ____________________________________________ Here's how you can get your OWN FREE Subscription: Send a blank mailto:[email protected] ____________________________________________ Copyright 1995 - 2005 Chicago Reader, Inc. All Rights Reserved You may forward this document by email ONLY if you include the entire document INCLUDING the information at the bottom of this publication ____________________________________________ Visit our good friends at Joke A Day http://www.jokeaday.com They're kind enough to mail THE STRAIGHT DOPE for us. Join the World's Largest Daily Humor List and receive daily laughs in your email by sending mailto:[email protected]