The Straight Dope 08/12/2005
[email protected] Fri, 12 Aug 2005 00:55:28 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.publications.straight-dope |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <LISTMANAGER-2907760-1144134-2005.08.12-00.55.29--gcps-straightdope-list#[email protected]> |
The Straight Dope -- By Cecil Adams http://www.straightdope.com You are subscribed as: [[email protected]] To unsubscribe CLICK on the URL below this line: mailto:[email protected] If you can't "click" above, then send a blank email to: [email protected] ____________________________________________ THE STRAIGHT DOPE 08/12/2005 Dear Cecil: A friend and I have a running disagreement on which type of natural disaster causes the most deaths and destruction in the U.S. and worldwide--hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes, wildfires, floods, etc. In a given year any one of them could cause massive destruction (like December's tragic tsunami disaster), but how about on average, and how has this changed over time (for example, floods in 1900 vs. tornadoes now)? --Andy B., via e-mail ~~~~~~ Looking for the perfect gift for that wedding, birthday, or bar mitzvah? Straight Dope books are the very thing! See http://www.straightdope.com/store.html ~~~~~~ Cecil replies: No offense, Andy, but you've got a pretty narrow idea of what constitutes a natural disaster--although I'll grant you it's one that's widely shared. The World Almanac, for example, has entries for hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, earthquakes, and the like but omits famines and epidemics, which generally are of natural origin, kill more people, and alter history to a substantially greater extent. One may argue that a natural disaster is a brief, impersonal convulsion in which humans are mere roadkill, whereas famines and epidemics take place over a longer period of time and human involvement is more central. But this seems to me a silly distinction that serves chiefly to eliminate the most shocking cases. Since the topic is dismayingly large, we'll take it in chunks: For more, see: http://www.straightdope.com/columns/050812.html STAFF REPORT Dear Straight Dope: Why exactly do TV sitcoms have recorded laughing--to remind us to laugh or what? --Chris Hill Guest contributor MsRobyn replies: I realize this doesn't say much for TV viewers, but the answer to your question essentially is yes--the purpose of a laugh track is to cue the audience to laugh. Just For those who were not raised on the boob tube, a laugh track is a pre-recorded effect that is inserted into some television shows, particularly those that aren''t taped in front of a live audience. They''re generally added in post-production; that is, after the show is taped, while it''s being edited for air. For more, see: http://www.straightdope.com/mailbag/mlaughtrack.html STRAIGHT DOPE CLASSIC - 08/10/1984 Dear Cecil: I read a lot of my "junk mail" with interest, so I'm not trying to end it all. But there are some junk mailers that really annoy me enough to make me want to make them pay, and pay, and pay. What's the best way to do this? The easy way, of course, is to send back their reply envelope ("no postage necessary if mailed in the United States") with no signature, address, etc., which makes them pay the business reply postage. But I keep wishing there was a better way. What if I stuff all the junk material that came with the mailing into the reply envelope, so that it weighs more than will go for the standard 20-cent rate? What if I enclose a sheet of scrap iron, or paste the envelope cover onto a brick? Surely there must be a legal method to make some of these villains think twice before they buy just any mailing list. --Winfield S., Chicago Cecil replies: Obviously, Winfield, you're a person who is consumed with cunning and wickedness. In short, you are my kinda guy. Come on over sometime and I'll buy you a brew. Unfortunately, your bricks-for- business scheme, admirable though it is in theory, won't work in practice. According to rule 917.243(b) in the Domestic Mail Manual, when a business reply card is "improperly used as a label"--e.g., when it's affixed to a brick--the item so labeled may be treated as "waste." That means the post office can heave it into the trash without further ado. Once upon a time, they tell me, things were different. . . For more, see: http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a2_356.html ____________________________________________ Here's how you can get your OWN FREE Subscription: Send a blank mailto:[email protected] ____________________________________________ Copyright 1995 - 2005 Chicago Reader, Inc. All Rights Reserved You may forward this document by email ONLY if you include the entire document INCLUDING the information at the bottom of this publication ____________________________________________ Visit our good friends at Joke A Day http://www.jokeaday.com They're kind enough to mail THE STRAIGHT DOPE for us. Join the World's Largest Daily Humor List and receive daily laughs in your email by sending mailto:[email protected]