The Straight Dope 02/02/2007
[email protected] Fri, 02 Feb 2007 05:50:01 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.publications.straight-dope |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <LISTMANAGER-2907760-1581-2007.02.02-05.50.03--gcps-straightdope-list#[email protected]> |
The Straight Dope -- By Cecil Adams http://www.straightdope.com You are subscribed as: [[email protected]] To unsubscribe CLICK on the URL below this line: mailto:[email protected] If you can't "click" above, then send a blank email to: [email protected] ____________________________________________ THE STRAIGHT DOPE 02/02/2007 Dear Cecil: In 2002 you said, "Long a target of fringe groups, fluoridation is widely considered one of the great public-health achievements of the last century." My wife has shown me a lot of Internet back-and-forth suggesting a host of problems that can be blamed on fluoridation. Some say fluoride is industrial waste and that the mining industry duped us into thinking it's healthy so we'd want it in our water. So is fluoride deadly or healthy, or do we just not know? --James B., Columbia, Maryland ~~~~~~ Looking for the perfect gift for that wedding, birthday, or bar mitzvah? Straight Dope books are the very thing! See http://www.straightdope.com/store.html ~~~~~~ Cecil replies: Oh, we've got a pretty fair idea. Fact is, like a lot of things (Tylenol and water come to mind), fluoride can be either good or bad for you depending on how much you get. In small amounts the stuff is definitely salubrious. Though a few holdouts still argue, most research I've seen credits fluoridation with the sharp drop in tooth decay seen throughout the developed world over the past 40 years. In the U.S., 67 percent of those drinking public water get fluoride in it and tooth decay has fallen 68 percent since the late 60s, leading the Centers for Disease Control to call water fluoridation one of the top ten public-health achievements of the 20th century. Too much of a good thing, on the other hand -- and we're talking milligrams per kilo of body weight, not gallons -- and you've got problems, ranging from stained teeth and upset stomach to death. Although fluoride's contribution to healthy teeth had been suspected earlier, the guy chiefly responsible for getting people to focus on the usefulness of having it in drinking water is Dr. Frederick McKay, who in 1909 began investigating a tooth discoloration so common among residents of Colorado Springs that it was known as "Colorado brown stain." After peering into the mouths of nearly 3,000 kids in the area and finding that 87 percent had stained teeth, McKay and colleagues went on to establish that (a) such teeth were unusually resistant to serious cavities and (b) the cause of both phenomena was the naturally high fluoride level in the local water supply. After further research showed that one part per million of fluoride in drinking water reduced tooth decay with minimal risk of stained teeth, Grand Rapids, Michigan, became the first city to artificially fluoridate its water in 1945. Thousands of other municipalities have done so since. For more, see: http://www.straightdope.com/columns/070202.html STAFF REPORT Dear Straight Dope: I've seen a lot of movies that feature gun silencers, and got to thinking about how they work. Are they really as effective as they're made to look on the big screen? I've fired quite a few firearms, and have a good idea for how loud they are in real life. I'm guessing that it takes a pretty clever device to reduce the deafening "BOOM" of, say, a .45 automatic to the discrete "thup" that you see and hear in the movies. What's the scoop? How do gun silencers work? Are they legal? --RevMarTye SDSTAFF Bricker responds: Though Hollywood treatments of firearms aren't noted for their realism, silencers by and large are an exception they work pretty much as depicted, at least for the first few uses. Before we get into ways to silence guns, though, it's useful to examine what makes them so loud. You may think those metal thingies Jack Bauer loads into his weapon, or would load if it were ever empty, are bullets. Not exactly. Strictly speaking they're cartridges -- a bullet clamped in a casing. The bullet is the projectile that's shot out of the gun barrel; the casing holds the bullet, primer, and gunpowder together before the shot is fired. Pulling the gun's trigger typically slams a pin into the rear end of the casing. That ignites the primer at the base of the cartridge, which in turn causes the powder to explode, releasing hot gas. The resultant high pressure blasts the bullet out of the casing, down the barrel, and out into the wild blue. Behind it, the hot gas from the explosion also emerges, no longer confined to the narrow barrel. Just as a party balloon pops loudly when ruptured, the escaping gas makes a loud bang. (The bullet, if it's traveling faster than sound, may also contribute a mini sonic boom to the mix). For more, see: http://www.straightdope.com/mailbag/msilencer.htm STRAIGHT DOPE CLASSIC - 03/30/1990 Dear Cecil: I want to start my own country. My question is, how do I go about this? I assume it is illegal to buy land in an existing country and proclaim sovereignty simply by virtue of ownership. Is there any way to avoid this difficulty and either (1) buy some territory in an existing country with the intent of seceding; (2) claim some previously unclaimed (or at least not very heavily guarded) land; (3) settle an area that had not existed earlier (e.g., a volcanic island); or (4) find some other way to realize my dream of founding a nation where all people are truly equal, the state respects individual rights, and free pizza delivery is constitutionally guaranteed? The fate of a nation rests on your answer. --James Hyder, Columbia, Maryland Cecil replies: I'm used to it, James. There are several schools of thought on what it takes to establish an independent state. One is that you're a nation if other countries recognize you as such. This approach has a certain practical appeal, but from a philosophical standpoint it eats. It suggests the minimum number of nations you can have is two, so each can recognize the other. More important, it denies reality: if you look like a nation and act like a nation, why should nonrecognition by a bunch of foreigners prevent you from actually being a nation? OK, but what constitutes looking and acting like a nation? Opinions differ, but some suggest there are four conditions: For more, see: http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a3_300.html ____________________________________________ Here's how you can get your OWN FREE Subscription: Send a blank mailto:[email protected] ____________________________________________ Copyright 1995 - 2007 Chicago Reader, Inc. All Rights Reserved You may forward this document by email ONLY if you include the entire document INCLUDING the information at the bottom of this publication ____________________________________________ Visit our good friends at Joke A Day http://www.jokeaday.com They're kind enough to mail THE STRAIGHT DOPE for us. Join the World's Largest Daily Humor List and receive daily laughs in your email by sending mailto:[email protected]