The Straight Dope 06/25/2004
[email protected] Fri, 25 Jun 2004 05:10:05 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.publications.straight-dope |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <LISTMANAGER-2907760-19979-2004.06.25-05.10.08--gcps-straightdope-list#[email protected]> |
The Straight Dope -- By Cecil Adams http://www.straightdope.com You are subscribed as: [[email protected]] To unsubscribe CLICK on the URL below this line: mailto:[email protected] If you can't "click" above, then send a blank email to: [email protected] ____________________________________________ THE STRAIGHT DOPE 06/25/2004 Dear Cecil: Many movie and TV westerns have a climactic scene in which two men face each other on a street in a dusty town. There's a lightning fast draw of pistols, shots are fired, and the bad guy almost always dies. Did this sort of gunfight, with two men drawing on each other, really happen in the old west? Were there really gunfighters known for their fast pistol draws and accuracy? --Chris Rohrs, Novato, California ~~~~~~ Looking for the perfect gift for that wedding, birthday, or bar mitzvah? Straight Dope books are the very thing! See http://www.straightdope.com/store.html ~~~~~~ Cecil replies: You figure I'm going to say it's all Hollywood. Hollywood definitely had a lot to do with it, but even in the classic cinematic depiction, High Noon (1952), Gary Cooper faces off not against a lone opponent but an armed gang. Truth is, the archetypal one-on-one showdown is one of those fixed ideas that doesn't have much basis in fiction, let alone in fact. Although a few such confrontations did occur, the Wild West had no tradition of formal dueling--the more common approach was to get the drop on the other guy before he got the drop on you. On the other hand, some of what we might guess was showbiz razzle-dazzle--spinning pistols, for one thing--may actually be legit. For more, see: http://www.straightdope.com/columns/040625.html STAFF REPORT Dear Straight Dope: Is there an herbal, or at least non-cancerous, cigarette non-smoking actors use while on camera? --Voltaaron Guest contributor Cervaise replies: The short answer is yes and no: A wide variety of products can be substituted for tobacco cigarettes if a nonsmoking actor is asked to play a smoker in a film or play. Most of them suffer from certain defects of verisimilitude, however. More importantly, there's no such thing as a noncarcinogenic smoke. In live theater, it's easier to fake this sort of thing because we expect the presentation to be stylized to some degree and we're more forgiving if something is not strictly realistic. Also, the audience tends to be farther away from the performer, so we don't get as clear a view of the prop. Sometimes faking it is as easy as using a real cigarette but not lighting it. For whatever reason, we accept an unlit cigarette on stage in much the same way we know but don't care that the fancy crystal decanter is actually full of iced tea instead of bourbon. For more, see: http://www.straightdope.com/mailbag/mcigsforactors.html STRAIGHT DOPE CLASSIC - 04/08/1983 Dear Cecil: ABC recently aired the movie classic, The Wizard of Oz, which brings to mind something I first heard in high school. A friend of mine had collected several of the Oz books by L. Frank Baum, and he said the one entitled The Wizard of Oz was in fact a satire of the French Revolution. The Tin Man, the Scarecrow, and the Lion represented different members of the royalty, and the various witches were somehow opposing factions--or maybe it was the other way around. I know Animal Farm satirized the Russian Revolution. Did The Wizard of Oz do the same for the French Revolution? If so, what characters represent which actual people? --Cameron G., Phoenix Dear Cameron: This is the first I've heard about a connection between The Wizard of Oz and the French Revolution. Your friend is obviously confused. Everybody knows the satire of the French Revolution was "Bye Bye Miss American Pie." The story I got about The Wizard of Oz was that it was an allegorical treatise on the Populist movement in the U.S. in the 1890s. This interpretation strikes me as being about as crazed as your friend's, but since it was published in an allegedly scholarly journal (Henry Littlefield, American Quarterly, 1964) ... well, I'll let you be the judge. For more, see: http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a1_392.html ____________________________________________ Here's how you can get your OWN FREE Subscription: Send a blank mailto:[email protected] ____________________________________________ Copyright 1995 - 2004 Chicago Reader, Inc. All Rights Reserved You may forward this document by email ONLY if you include the entire document INCLUDING the information at the bottom of this publication ____________________________________________ Visit our good friends at Joke A Day http://www.jokeaday.com They're kind enough to mail THE STRAIGHT DOPE for us. Join the World's Largest Daily Humor List and receive daily laughs in your email by sending mailto:[email protected]