Re: Scumbag Bush Is Trying To Change Constitution To Ban Gay Marriages

Yeah Bush is an ass hole I say we burn down the stupid fuching white
house!!!!!!!!!!!!



--- In [email protected], "Caesar The Terror" 
<NewSatAgen999@a...> wrote:
> 
> Bush is shit, bottom line! Democracy is a lie and has failed many 
> billions of people! Anyone who watches cspan or cnn can watch how 
> utterly psychotically sophisticated and crookedly twisted the 
> governmental system has become. You can watch how the republican 
run 
> senate is strong arming their way through everything. They are not 
> even listening to democrats at all. They are going to vote in only 
> their republican scum judges, and pass laws they believe in, etc. 
> Democracy has never worked and it never will! The only truth is, 
who 
> is stronger, who is more powerful! Majority rule is just a catch 
> phrase for the dominant power, when they do have control of those 
> ruling authorities. In the end, no one will believe in the lie of 
> democracy and see the real truth, what goes on every day, dominate 
or 
> be dominated! Now, that scumbag bush intends to use lawyers and 
> executive powers to change the constitution to ban gays from their 
> rights to gay marriage. This in my opinion reveals the war that we 
> have been fighting against our judeo-christian enemies for 
thousands 
> of years. The war cries will be heard again and we want bush's head 
> on a silver platter! There is one thing that is certain, Gays will 
> have legal marriage on the same level as heterosexuals, with the 
same 
> rights and privileges or the war will get much worse and many 
youths 
> on both sides will have their bloody bodies dragged through the 
> streets of our hell! The judeo-christian zionist rich class empire 
> will be destroyed! Here, read on how bush is working to ban gay 
> marriages, which only fuels the war engines against their crumbling 
> world order. 
> 
> Caesar 999
> 
> 
> -------------------
> 
> 
> WASHINGTON (July 30) -- President Bush said Wednesday he has 
> government lawyers working on a law that would define marriage as a 
> union between a woman and a man, casting aside calls to legalize 
gay 
> marriages.
> 
> ''I believe marriage is between a man and a woman and I believe we 
> ought to codify that one way or the other and we have lawyers 
looking 
> at the best way to do that,'' the president said a wide-ranging 
news 
> conference at the White House Rose Garden.
> 
> Bush also urged, however, that America remain a ''welcoming 
> country'' - not polarized on the issue of homosexuality.
> 
> ''I am mindful that we're all sinners and I caution those who may 
try 
> to take a speck out of the neighbor's eye when they got a log in 
> their own,'' the president said. ''I think it is important for our 
> society to respect each individual, to welcome those with good 
> hearts.''
> 
> ''On the other hand, that does not mean that someone like me needs 
to 
> compromise on the issue of marriage,'' he added.
> 
> Bush has long opposed gay marriage but as recently as earlier this 
> month had said that a constitutional ban on gay marriage proposed 
in 
> the House might not be needed despite a Supreme Court decision that 
> some conservatives think opens the door to legalizing same-sex 
> marriages.
> 
> The Supreme Court struck down a Texas law that made homosexual sex 
a 
> crime, overturning an earlier ruling that said states could punish 
> homosexuals for having sex.
> 
> Conservative Justice Antonin Scalia fired off a blistering dissent 
of 
> the ruling.
> 
> The ''opinion dismantles the structure of constitutional law that 
has 
> permitted a distinction to be made between heterosexual and 
> homosexual unions, insofar as formal recognition in marriage is 
> concerned,'' Scalia wrote. The ruling specifically said that the 
> court was not addressing that issue, but Scalia warned, ''Do not 
> believe it.''
> 
> Rep. Marilyn Musgrave, R-Colo., is the main sponsor of the proposal 
> offered May 21 to amend the Constitution. It was referred on June 
25 
> to the House Judiciary subcommittee on the Constitution.
> 
> To be added to the Constitution, the proposal must be approved by 
two-
> thirds of the House and the Senate and ratified by three-fourths of 
> the states.