Rwanda
"Na'eem Jeenah" <[email protected]> Wed, 26 May 2004 17:39:17 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.religion.muslim.progressive |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <40B4D645.2208.302EF871@localhost> |
salaam
a couple of weeks ago - i think - I visited rwanda. I wrote a piece
abuot it when I got back. However, I wasn't subscribed to PMN at
the time - changed email addies - and so didn't post it here. Since
I've been resubscribd now, I thought I'd post it.
Please note, there has been a criticism (from 2 of my students, no
less) which I completely agree with. However, I dont have the time
to amend it now. So let me just say what it is. They argued that I
was too kind to Kagame. That his undemocratic practices, etc, give
a different impression from what I give in the article. They are right!
My only defence is that I wrote this the day after I returned and so
was still a tad overcome with emotion. (Not that its a good defence,
but I can try.)
Below is the article. Ignore the Kagame bits and enjoy
We should all weep and feel ashamed
BLURB: Na'eem Jeenah reflects on a journey through
Rwanda's Kigali Memorial Centre, and calls for us to be
thankful to the people of that traumatised nation
I walked out of the building numbed; looking back now I
am surprised that my legs were even able to carry me. My
eyes were glazed; my arms limp at my sides. I wasn't the
only one. Young, brave men tried desperately to hold
back their tears, and failed miserably. Adult experienced
men broke down and wept; one broke out in a sweat
minutes after we had entered and twitched nervously as it
dripped off his face.
Chief muftis of a number of African countries shook their
heads in mourning and invoked Allah's Mercy. The
former Libyan ambassador to Rwanda, who had
witnessed the 1994 genocide, cried as the memories
flooded back.
We had just walked out of the Kigali Memorial Centre,
established this year, ten years after the holocaust that
had devastated Rwanda, in memory of the 1000000 lives
lost in 100 days of slaughter.
Perhaps it was the last room in the Centre, the Children's
Memorial, that had done it for many of us. Happy
pictures after happy pictures of children that had been
murdered, with five or six line biographies. Fabrice, 15
months old, 'killed in Muhoro Church'. Yves, 3 years old,
'hacked by machete'. Ariane, 4 years old, 'stabbed in the
eyes and head'. Two-year-olds, 'smashed against a wall'.
The Centre is a powerful reminder of what had happened
in this city and in this country; and of what has happened
elsewhere - to Bosnians as victims of Serb supremacism,
to Armenians as victims of Turkish arrogance, to Jews as
victims of Nazi herrenvolkism; to Native Americans as
victims of European colonisation; and of what continues
to happen today - to Kashmiris as victims of Indian
nationalism, to Palestinians as victims of Zionist
fundamentalism.
Set up with the assistance of a British trust, the memorial
is located in the Gisozi district of Kigali, the site chosen
for the mass burial of 250000 victims. It is a
sophisticated and sterile memorial, with multimedia
presentations of the genocide - unlike some memorials in
other towns whose raw power is in their featuring of piles
of skulls and skeletons.
Rwanda is a beautiful land of rolling green hills and
mountains highlighted by forests and lakes, intersected by
rivers and punctuated by earth-coloured buildings.
Despite the red that coloured the landscape in 1994, it
remains mesmerisingly attractive. It is the stuff of artists'
inspirations.
Its people go about their business with diligence, and
even though the poverty is stark, crime is virtually non-
existent - a fact that might be a little difficult to appreciate
when one remembers that not long ago Rwandans killed
more than a million of their own people in three months.
We five South Africans that visited the Memorial were
attending a conference of the Union of Muslim Councils
(UMC), with Muslim community leaders - mostly national
muftis - from 27 African countries.
Having been fed for years on the notion of African tribal
rivalries, we were shocked to discover that there is
actually only one 'tribe' in Rwanda. One tribe, one
language - Kinyarwanda, one history. So what about the
Hutu and Tutsi 'tribes'? There are no such things! The
Hutu-Tutsi identities as they existed in the 20th Century
were creations of Belgian colonial authorities.
The land was colonised by the Germans in 1895 and
handed over to Belgian occupation in 1916, after the First
World War (or the First European Tribal War as Malcolm
X preferred to call it), by the League of Nations.
By the turn of the 20th Century, the terms 'Hutu', 'Tutsi'
and 'Twa' were class classifications which could change
with circumstances. The Belgians converted these into
'racial' categories and reflected these in identity cards they
issued. The arbitrariness of this 'racial' categorisation is
reflected in the policy that anyone with 10 or more cows
in 1932 - and his descendants - was regarded as Tutsi;
anyone with less than 10 was a Hutu. A minority of the
new Tutsis were then favoured by the Belgians with jobs
and status, resulting in a great deal of resentment among
the rest.
From before independence in 1962, there was already a
backlash against Tutsis, with organised massacres taking
place from 1959. Some 700000 Rwandans were forced
into exile - including to South Africa - between 1959 and
1973 because of the Belgian-encouraged ethnic cleansing.
After independence, Hutus dominated politics and
successive post-independence governments - mostly
fascist in a single-party state - entrenched the divisions
and the persecution of Tutsis. With the corporate-
engineered collapse of coffee prices in the 1980s, the
economy deteriorated and Hutus tightened their
economic control.
The Belgians' divide-and-rule strategy didn't manifest only
with the Hutu-Tutsi divide. Muslims were identified as a
separate group - whether Hutu or Tutsi. Swahili Camp in
Kigali bears testimony to this. It was created to intern
Muslims. Camp residents were only allowed out with
written permission and no non-Muslims were allowed in.
It remained a poverty-stricken ghetto until after 1994.
In 1990, President Juv=E9nal Habyarimana formed the
notorious Interahamwe, the Hutu youth militia which,
four years later, was to lead the anti-Tutsi genocide,
together with the extremist media and the church
hierarchy - both Hutu-controlled. Between then and the
1994 genocide, eight major anti-Tutsi massacres took
place.
The Arusha Peace Accords in 1993 between the
government and the liberation movement, the Rwanda
Patriotic Front (RPF), was to lead to a democratically-
elected government. But the government and the Hutu
elite were not interested in peace. Plans were put into
place by the Interahamwe for the final extermination of
Tutsis. Death lists were drawn up in advance; 1000
Tutsis must be killed every 20 minutes.
And all through this, the western world supported the
government with aid - including a huge arms package
from the French in 1993. By 1994, despite numerous
warning signs and appeals from UN forces on the ground,
the UN refused to respond to the genocide waiting to
happen. The US prevented a resolution for UN forces to
be sent in; Kofi Annan instructed that no action be taken.
On 6 April 1994, as South Africa prepared for our first
democratic elections, the Rwandan holocaust began. For
100 days, 10000 people were killed every day, 400 every
hour.
And the world watched, complicit in our silence. We
watched as one million people were massacred. As many
more were raped, tortured, mutilated, orphaned. As
neighbours killed neighbours. As 20000 people were
slaughtered in the Nyarubuye church. As Tutsi women
were systematically raped as a weapon of genocide. As
children were forced to kill their friends and neighbours.
As the country's infrastructure was devastated. As,
suddenly, 85000 children became heads of households.
As the humanity of us all: the victims, the survivors, the
perpetrators and the witnesses from afar, diminished.
But there were many Rwandans who endangered their
lives in order to restore our humanity. People who hid,
protected, saved others at risk, often giving up their own
lives in the process.
And foremost among these were the Muslims of Rwanda.
Today, when Muslims are maligned all over the world as
terrorists, when Muslims fight to save their lives and their
honour, we can take pride in the struggles of the Muslim
community of Rwanda 10 years ago.
Shaikh Hassan, an 'alim that I met in Kigali, told me how
his mother had hidden 10 Tutsi families in her home,
saving their lives.
Yahaya Nsengiyumva saved the lives of over 30 people
by hiding them in his outhouse. One survivor recalls being
chased by Interahamwe, knowing she would die 'any
second', banging on Yahaya's door and being given
sanctuary because, she remembers, he said the Qur'an
says: 'If you save one life, it is like saving the whole
world'.
When, in Nyange, Father Seromba gave the order to
bulldoze his own church on top of his own congregation
of 2000 people, Muslim 'ulama in Rwanda were
encouraging unity and protecting Tutsis, trying to stem
the terrible tide of the genocide.
It is no surprise, then, that entire villages have been, over
the past few years, converting to Islam and leaving the
Catholicism brought by the Belgians, the same Belgians
who divided the Rwandan nation and set the scene for
1994.
And, it is no surprise that the new transitional
government, headed by former RPF guerrilla leader Paul
Kagame, appointed a Muslim woman to head the
country's Unity and Reconciliation Commission.
A tall, gentle man, Kagame has worked tirelessly for the
past decade to create national unity, to create a Rwandan
identity. He, like many other Rwandans, gets particularly
irritated when asked whether he is Hutu or Tutsi and
refuses to answer.
This year, as the world celebrates 10 years of South
African democracy, some attention should also be paid to
10 years of Rwandan reconstruction under Kagame. Ten
years of building homes, trying to develop the economy,
addressing the poverty problem. As we remember 10
years after the Rwanda genocide, we should also
celebrate Rwanda over the past 10 years - something
Africa can be proud of.
When we walked out of the Memorial Centre and Saleh
Habib, Mufti of Rwanda and now chairperson of the
UMC, told me to read a statement to the media, I felt
foolish. What could I say, no matter how well crafted a
statement, that could sincerely express our response to
what we had just witnessed? And so, as I nervously
wiped the sweat from my brow, it was a hollow, dull
reading, an inadequate attempt to articulate to a
brutalised people how deeply their brutalisation had
affected us and how very significant their experiences are
to all of us that call ourselves human.
There were no smiles on the faces of the muftis as we
boarded the buses. Our future journeys would be
profoundly influenced by this mass grave, this memorial
to the worse-than-animal in all our breasts, ready to
emerge if we allow it to.