CryoNet #31756

CryoNet <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.culture.science.cryogenics
Message-ID <[email protected]>
CryoNet - Mon 22 Jun 2009

    #31756: Why hasn't cryonics become a status symbol? [Mark Plus]

Rate This Digest: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=31756%2D31756

Administrivia

To subscribe to CryoNet, send email to:
    [email protected]
with the subject line (not message _body_):
    subscribe
To unsubscribe, use the subject line:
    unsubscribe

To post a message to CryoNet, send your message to:
    [email protected]
(Note: A "Subject:" line starting the message body replaces
the "Subject:" line in the header.  This gives a second
opportunity to provide a meaningful subject line.)

Since all CryoNet messages are archived and accessible via WWW,
including search engines, make certain that your postings
reflect how you want the world to see you.

To retrieve past messages, send email to:
    [email protected]
with the message numbers in the subject line.
(Message 0003 describes the advanced syntax.)
You also can retrieve them via the CryoNet web page at URL:
    http://www.cryonet.org/

For administrative or other questions/suggestions, send email
to me at "[email protected]" with "cryonics" in the subject line.
    - Kevin Q. Brown


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message #31756
From: Mark Plus <[email protected]>
Subject: Why hasn't cryonics become a status symbol?
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 18:52:42 -0700

I raised this question with some other cryonicists recently, but we didn't have any good answers.

The misconception persists that only very rich people can afford cryonics, despite all the evidence to the contrary (like the 1989 Subaru station wagon I drive); and that they have signed up for it in considerable numbers. Nicholas von Hoffman promotes this belief in an essay he published in The Nation magazine a few years ago:



Freezing Their Assets

http://www.thenation.com/doc/20060227/vonhoffman

Normally, the kinds of things that only very rich people can afford tend to become status symbols, like mansions, yachts, private jets, or in an extreme case, a trip to the International Space Station care of the Russians.

If so many ordinary people believe that very rich people have flocked to cryonics, why hasn't cryonics become a status symbol like the other goods, services and experiences very rich people tend to buy and that many non-rich people wish they could have as well?

"Around 2010 the world will be at a new orbit in history. . .  Life expectancy will be indefinite. Disease and disability will nonexist. Death will be rare and accidental -- but not permanent. We will continuously jettison our obsolescence and grow younger." F.M. Esfandiary, "Up-Wing Priorities" (1981).
http://www.box.net/shared/static/ay9lub60ha.pdf
http://www.scribd.com/doc/10948503/Up-Wing-Priorities


Mark Plus



_________________________________________________________________
Lauren found her dream laptop. Find the PC that's right for you.
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/choosepc/?ocid=ftp_val_wl_290

Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=31756

----------------------------------------------------------------------

End of CryoNet Digest
*********************
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.