CryoNet #31842 - #31843

CryoNet <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.culture.science.cryogenics
Message-ID <[email protected]>
CryoNet - Mon 3 Aug 2009

    #31842: RE: Oregon and Cryonics [Jordan Sparks]
    #31843: #31841 [Robert Newport]

Rate This Digest: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=31842%2D31843

Administrivia

To subscribe to CryoNet, send email to:
    [email protected]
with the subject line (not message _body_):
    subscribe
To unsubscribe, use the subject line:
    unsubscribe

To post a message to CryoNet, send your message to:
    [email protected]
(Note: A "Subject:" line starting the message body replaces
the "Subject:" line in the header.  This gives a second
opportunity to provide a meaningful subject line.)

Since all CryoNet messages are archived and accessible via WWW,
including search engines, make certain that your postings
reflect how you want the world to see you.

To retrieve past messages, send email to:
    [email protected]
with the message numbers in the subject line.
(Message 0003 describes the advanced syntax.)
You also can retrieve them via the CryoNet web page at URL:
    http://www.cryonet.org/

For administrative or other questions/suggestions, send email
to me at "[email protected]" with "cryonics" in the subject line.
    - Kevin Q. Brown


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message #31842
From: "Jordan Sparks" <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Oregon and Cryonics
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 08:07:08 -0700

I think it could be used in the right circumstances.  The person would have
to be terminal and follow the established protocol.  The cryonics would
still come post-mortem just like any other case.

Jordan Sparks

-----Original Message-----


I have often wondered why the right to die laws in Oregon are not used in
conjunction with Cryonic service providers to allow for pre-mortem (or at
least timely) suspensions. Any comment on the viability of this from the
list?

Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=31842

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message #31843
From: "Robert Newport" <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Subject: #31841
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 15:04:17 -0700

Hi everyone: I do hope that one day, our suspension might be insured by
health care insurers, (whichever system is the most enlightened public or
private) as it is only a matter of time that suspension will be accepted as
a medical technology, useful in preserving life. Of note here; while
suspension costs vary with in a few tens of thousands of dollars, end of
life care averages 250K. This would be a very big cost savings for the
health care insurance industry. Dr. Robert 

Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=31843

----------------------------------------------------------------------

End of CryoNet Digest
*********************
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.