CryoNet #32972 - #32973

CryoNet - Sat 23 Oct 2010

    #32972: "Difficult to check math"? [Perry E. Metzger]
    #32973: Eugen Leitl on "Future Squatters" [MARK PLUS]

Rate This Digest: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=32972%2D32973

Administrivia

To subscribe to CryoNet, send email to:
    [email protected]
with the subject line (not message _body_):
    subscribe
To unsubscribe, use the subject line:
    unsubscribe
To post a message to CryoNet, send your message to:
    [email protected]
from the same address to which you are aubscribed.
Send questions, comments, or feedback to [email protected]
with "CryoNet" or "cryonics" somewhere in the Subject line.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message #32972
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 09:47:42 -0400
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <[email protected]>
Subject: "Difficult to check math"?
References: <[email protected]>

> From: Gerald Monroe <[email protected]>
> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 06:03:07 -0500
>
> I've been reading nanosystems, and I do see what you mean by
> "physically dubious assumptions".  Drexler fills the pages with
> math that is both incredibly difficult to check,

Is it hard to check? Can you give an example?

Perry
-- 
Perry E. Metzger		[email protected]

Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=32972

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message #32973
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 20:00:04 -0700
Subject: Eugen Leitl on "Future Squatters"
From: MARK PLUS <[email protected]>

CRYONICS: Understanding Why It Failed

http://transvision2010.wordpress.com/2010/08/19/transvision-2010-presentation-by-eugen-leitl/

Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=32973

----------------------------------------------------------------------

End of CryoNet Digest
*********************