Re: StratoSolar

David Hobby <hobbyd-EA9mSNTTxwr2fBVCVOL8/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.culture.sf.killerbs
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Keith Henson wrote:
> StratoSolar
> 
> This is off NDA so I can go into detail.
...
 > Ed's
> approach, which he named StratoSolar, was to reduce the mass from
> hundreds of kg per kW to a few tens of kg by moving the solar
> concentrator into the stratosphere as a large, lightweight, buoyant
> structure.
...
> The concentrated sunlight gets to the ground via a hollow light pipe
> lined with highly reflective prismatic plastic.  Preliminary
> optimization for kg/kW leads to a 30-meter diameter light pipe with
> less than 10% loss.  A larger pipe has lower losses but uses more
> total material per kW.

Keith--

Hi.  StratoSolar is interesting.  I looked at the website
when you mentioned it a month ago.  At the time, this
was my main objection:

> I see bigger problems with losses in the light pipe.
> The plan seems to be to have a flexible tube lined
> with reflective material to guide the solar radiation
> down to steam turbines or whatever on the ground.
> Most of the light would have to reflect off the sides
> many times, losing at least a few percent of its
> intensity at each reflection.  So nothing makes it
> to the ground, and the light pipe melts.  There may
> be solutions to this too, but they're going to be
> tricky. 

How many reflections are you assuming light will make
as it goes down the pipe, and how glancing are they?

				---David
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.