Re: StratoSolar
David Hobby <hobbyd-EA9mSNTTxwr2fBVCVOL8/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.sf.killerbs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Keith Henson wrote: > StratoSolar > > This is off NDA so I can go into detail. ... > Ed's > approach, which he named StratoSolar, was to reduce the mass from > hundreds of kg per kW to a few tens of kg by moving the solar > concentrator into the stratosphere as a large, lightweight, buoyant > structure. ... > The concentrated sunlight gets to the ground via a hollow light pipe > lined with highly reflective prismatic plastic. Preliminary > optimization for kg/kW leads to a 30-meter diameter light pipe with > less than 10% loss. A larger pipe has lower losses but uses more > total material per kW. Keith-- Hi. StratoSolar is interesting. I looked at the website when you mentioned it a month ago. At the time, this was my main objection: > I see bigger problems with losses in the light pipe. > The plan seems to be to have a flexible tube lined > with reflective material to guide the solar radiation > down to steam turbines or whatever on the ground. > Most of the light would have to reflect off the sides > many times, losing at least a few percent of its > intensity at each reflection. So nothing makes it > to the ground, and the light pipe melts. There may > be solutions to this too, but they're going to be > tricky. How many reflections are you assuming light will make as it goes down the pipe, and how glancing are they? ---David