Breastfeeding on Facebook

>> I didn't say that. What I said is that only 
>> sociopaths, perverts and baby killers can think 
>> that breastfeeding is obscene.
 
> Would you agree that it is in bad taste
> to use foul language, even though it is an expression 
> of free speech that some feel is disrespectful and 
> offensive, or are they just prudes who don't deserve 
> to have an opinion?
 
Non sequitur. How does the use of foul language
correlate to breastfeeding? Do you think breastfeeding
is some way disgusting or offensive?

>> and another picture of the Google model:
>> http://www.iamboredr.com/media/1645/Boobs/

>> The girl is fully clothed, what's the point?

> NO way was she fully dressed! (although her nipples 
> were covered)

QED. And I still can't see why you posted that
image. Is it to protest against the induction of
breast cancer caused by the use of tight bras?

> I have never heard of a Facebook rule 
> outlawing pictures of women breast feeding in public.  
> Are you certain about this, Alberto?

I was trying to make the point that there are far 
more important issues than a breast feeding ban on
Facebook, such as privacy, or using foul language, 
which I have seen all over Facebook. I was a bottle 
baby myself, which may explain why I posted those 
cleavage pictures!~)  Do you think I may harbor 
some deeply buried resentment because I was denied 
my own Mommy's breast?~)

As for the Google girl with the giant titties; I 
was being ironic.  I honestly had no idea tight 
bras caused breast cancer!~)

Thanks to Charlie's link I recognize that Facebook 
truly is banning breast feeding pictures.  I wonder 
who were the people who were posting the obscene 
pictures of breast feeding that prompted Facebook 
to take such drastic action.

Nevertheless, I will continue to use Facebook and
guard my privacy as best I can; which is what I 
consider to be a far more important reason to avoid 
using the electronic interface.
Jon