Re: Various Items

Mauro Diotallevi <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.culture.sf.killerbs
Message-ID <CANvKHfD6S-+Vk0-J4Fg1cu+UmCAgAtbBHcsTZGoA2nLsd2y_Vw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Bryon Daly <[email protected]> wrote:

> I thought Cars 2 was enjoyable, but a step down from Pixar's usual
> greatness.  Mater's character arc was to shallow for me to have much feel
> for him beyond the comedy relief, and Lightning's "accept your friends as
> they are" subplot really felt forced.  Not bad, but I didn't walk out with
> anywhere near the same level of feelings I had for, say Wall-E, TS3, The
> Incredibles, or even the original Cars.  I suspect the critics' negative
> reaction is largely based on their high expectations for Pixar films being
> disappointed - I don't think it was the spy/sci-fi elements.

The first Cars didn't do much for me.  Neither did Wall-E, past the
first 20 or 30 minutes.  But I loved The Incredibles, TS3, and UP
(squirrel!).  I enjoyed the second one so much because I adore spy
movies, and that might have been part of the reason I loved The
Incredibles (well, that and the fact that it was just a truly great
movie all the way around).  My favorite Pixar movie remains
Ratatouille, with The Incredibles as a very close second.  But I'm a
foodie, so Ratatouille makes sense for me from that perspective.

I have a couple of friends who are film critics who liked Cars 2, but
many of their critic friends did not, and my friends theorized it was
because they hate "gadget films."

-- 
Mauro Diotallevi
"The number you have dialed is imaginary.  Please rotate your phone 90
degrees and try again."
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.