Re: Various Items
Mauro Diotallevi <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.sf.killerbs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CANvKHfD6S-+Vk0-J4Fg1cu+UmCAgAtbBHcsTZGoA2nLsd2y_Vw@mail.gmail.com> |
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Bryon Daly <[email protected]> wrote: > I thought Cars 2 was enjoyable, but a step down from Pixar's usual > greatness. Mater's character arc was to shallow for me to have much feel > for him beyond the comedy relief, and Lightning's "accept your friends as > they are" subplot really felt forced. Not bad, but I didn't walk out with > anywhere near the same level of feelings I had for, say Wall-E, TS3, The > Incredibles, or even the original Cars. I suspect the critics' negative > reaction is largely based on their high expectations for Pixar films being > disappointed - I don't think it was the spy/sci-fi elements. The first Cars didn't do much for me. Neither did Wall-E, past the first 20 or 30 minutes. But I loved The Incredibles, TS3, and UP (squirrel!). I enjoyed the second one so much because I adore spy movies, and that might have been part of the reason I loved The Incredibles (well, that and the fact that it was just a truly great movie all the way around). My favorite Pixar movie remains Ratatouille, with The Incredibles as a very close second. But I'm a foodie, so Ratatouille makes sense for me from that perspective. I have a couple of friends who are film critics who liked Cars 2, but many of their critic friends did not, and my friends theorized it was because they hate "gadget films." -- Mauro Diotallevi "The number you have dialed is imaginary. Please rotate your phone 90 degrees and try again."