Time
Jon Louis Mann <net_democracy-/[email protected]> Fri, 13 Mar 2015 11:25:57 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.sf.killerbs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
There is a fascinating discussion on my Marxist list serve; here is an exce= rpt... Louis, you have raised a very interesting subject. How can anybody say that= the views expressed by some 'physicsts' about reality, time and quantum wo= rld have nothing to do with Marxism?=A0 We have to put up a frontal attack = on the non-scientific nonsense, in the guise of science. To top it all, one= famous scientist claims that mathematical equations gave rise to the unive= rse! = Vijaya Kumar M I don't think that time is an 'illusion', and I consider myself a materiali= st, and I have to defer to the observational ability of sub-atomic and astr= ophysicists; but it seems to me that time is not an independent phenomenon;= it is a human-devised system to describe human perception of the changes i= n the ever-fluctuating status of matter (e.g. days, years, life spans, half= -lives). A typical dictionary definition of time would be 'a system of sequential re= lations'. It's kinda like the tree falling in the forest - if there's no se= ntient ear, there's no sound. By the way, I think that from a practical perspective, 'space' isn't an ind= ependent phenomenon either. It's just the absence of matter. Discussions of= , say, 'curved space' are really describing the relation/activity of matter= or 'force'... - Mike Fahey People should understand that I only post such material to get a rise out o= f folks like Jeff. It is like the sand that irritates the oyster. Louis Proyect Aha! I should have known. More surprisingly though, I now see that there are others on this list who = might fancy playing the same game -- even to the point of advancing idealis= t conceptions on a Marxism list! -- so I'll avoid snatching the bait. If an= yone wants to discuss serious questions of physics, I would participate. If= they would like to couch their questions or comments in terms of "Marxism"= I can deal with that too. After all, physics and Marxism share the same un= derlying philosophical basis: materialism. But neither usefully informs the= content of the other. - Jeff