Re: FW: What People in 1900 Thought the Year 2000 Would Look Like
Barry Haworth <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.sf.literature |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAF7Mvz1BuCSoboV1mOx5WnPS6=+c6PHx7sNjKVsTvu27wbQASg@mail.gmail.com> |
These are somewhat whimsical, but a little while ago I came across a more seriosu effort at prediction: an article from the Brisbane Sunday Mail of August 1931, a speculative article about what Brisbane might be like 100 years hence: http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/page/10202974 We're still a few years short, but I find it instructive to see what they got right and what they did not. Some things that it got right: - Outer regions like Redcliffe and Southport functioning as suburbs to Brisbane (the train line to Redcliffe is still under construction, but will be completed before 2031). - Routine air travel to other cities in Australia, and elsewhere in the world. - Every house has a car parking place - Every person carries a mobile phone, which includes a device for determining its location. - There is a lot of interest in health and fitness, and home gym equipment is a commonplace. Some things they got wrong: - Private households do not have personal flying machines, and landing pads in the city are rare. - Speed of trains. Trains travel at about 60 mph, not at 200. - Speed of aircraft. Instead of propellor aircraft which fly from Brisbane to Sydney in 2 hours and rocket aircraft which get to London in 6, we have jet aircraft for both destinations (1 hour and 28 hours respectively). Though I guess we have a bit of time on that one. (Ditto flights to Mars) - Voting methods. We do not have a device in each household to allow citizens to vote electronically on matters of importance. Or perhaps I should say the device (computers attached to the internet) is there, but no one has made a serious attempt to use them in that way. Barry On 14 October 2015 at 02:27, Cahill, Colleen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > *From:* Dennis Fischer [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Sunday, October 04, 2015 10:42 PM > *To:* Sf Readers List; Brooke Lambie; Susan Hathaway; Pamm Handel; > Kathryn Stuckey; Doug Woods; MIchael Hall; Marlene Willauer-Lowe; Tim > Ziesmer > *Subject:* What People in 1900 Thought the Year 2000 Would Look Like > > > What people in 1900 thought the year 2000 would look like > > > > > > By Ana Swanson <http://www.washingtonpost.com/people/ana-swanson> > > There are few things as fascinating as seeing what people in the past > dreamed about the future. > > "France in the Year 2000" is one example. The series of paintings, made by > Jean-Marc Côté and other French artists in 1899, 1900, 1901 and 1910, shows > artist depictions of what life might look like in the year 2000. The first > series of images were printed and enclosed in cigarette and cigar boxes > around the time of the 1900 World Exhibition in Paris, according to the > Public Domain Review > <http://publicdomainreview.org/collections/france-in-the-year-2000-1899-1910/>, > then later turned into postcards. > > *[The next 800,686 years, in sci-fi predictions > <http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonkblog/wp/2015/08/11/the-next-800686-years-in-sci-fi-predictions/>]* > > Lots of their ideas involve mechanized devices, flying, or a combination > of the two. Some, strangely, involve people interacting in a very close and > personal way with marine life. As Open Culture points out > <http://www.openculture.com/2015/09/how-french-artists-in-1899-envisioned-life-in-the-year-2000.html>, > however, there are no images of space travel. > > *[Kurt Vonnegut graphed the world’s most popular stories > <http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonkblog/wp/2015/02/09/kurt-vonnegut-graphed-the-worlds-most-popular-stories/>]* > > Some of the portraits are fantastic -- swashbucklers riding on giant > seahorses, anyone? But others are actually surprisingly accurate visions of > our current era, including farming machines, helicopters, and what looks > like a precursor to the new robot vaccum, the iRobot Roomba vacuum: > > > France in the Year 2000 > > There is something vaguely familiar about these visions of mechanized > farming, for example: > > > France in the Year 2000 > > > France in the Year 2000 > > Perhaps this is the precursor to the motorhome? > > > France in the Year 2000 > > However, some of the other machines didn't quite come to pass: > > > France in the Year 2000 > > > France in the Year 2000 > > > France in the Year 2000 > > > France in the Year 2000 > > > France in the Year 2000 > > The series also features a great assortment of flying machines and > devices, including a helicopter: > > > France in the Year 2000 > > One drawing features an airship, which were being used at the time, but > fell out of favor after the Hindenburg disaster in 1937: > > > France in the Year 2000 > > The series imagines small winged planes or devices being used by cabbies, > postmen, police, firemen and hunters: > > > France in the Year 2000 > > > France in the Year 2000 > > > France in the Year 2000 > > > France in the Year 2000 > > > France in the Year 2000 > > Here's their conception of a "war plane" and "war cars": > > > France in the Year 2000 > > > France in the Year 2000 > > Strangely, the series also includes some fairly far-out examples of people > cavorting with marine life: > > > France in the Year 2000 > > > France in the Year 2000 > > > France in the Year 2000 > > > France in the Year 2000 > > And finally, the "Whale bus," which really ought to be a thing by now: > > > France in the Year 2000 > > > -- I am a Statistician. One False move and you're a Statistic.