Re: FW: What People in 1900 Thought the Year 2000 Would Look Like

Barry Haworth <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.culture.sf.literature
Message-ID <CAF7Mvz1BuCSoboV1mOx5WnPS6=+c6PHx7sNjKVsTvu27wbQASg@mail.gmail.com>
These are somewhat whimsical, but a little while ago I came across a more
seriosu effort at prediction: an article from the Brisbane Sunday Mail of
August 1931, a speculative article about what Brisbane might be like 100
years hence:

http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/page/10202974

We're still a few years short, but I find it instructive to see what they
got right and what they did not.

Some things that it got right:
- Outer regions like Redcliffe and Southport functioning as suburbs to
Brisbane (the train line to Redcliffe is still under construction, but will
be completed before 2031).
- Routine air travel to other cities in Australia, and elsewhere in the
world.
- Every house has a car parking place
- Every person carries a mobile phone, which includes a device for
determining its location.
- There is a lot of interest in health and fitness, and home gym equipment
is a commonplace.

Some things they got wrong:
- Private households do not have personal flying machines, and landing pads
in the city are rare.
- Speed of trains.  Trains travel at about 60 mph, not at 200.
- Speed of aircraft.  Instead of propellor aircraft which fly from Brisbane
to Sydney in 2 hours and rocket aircraft which get to London in 6, we have
jet aircraft for both destinations (1 hour and 28 hours respectively).
Though I guess we have a bit of time on that one.  (Ditto flights to Mars)
- Voting methods.  We do not have a device in each household to allow
citizens to vote electronically on matters of importance.  Or perhaps I
should say the device (computers attached to the internet) is there, but no
one has made a serious attempt to use them in that way.

Barry

On 14 October 2015 at 02:27, Cahill, Colleen <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
>
>
> *From:* Dennis Fischer [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Sunday, October 04, 2015 10:42 PM
> *To:* Sf Readers List; Brooke Lambie; Susan Hathaway; Pamm Handel;
> Kathryn Stuckey; Doug Woods; MIchael Hall; Marlene Willauer-Lowe; Tim
> Ziesmer
> *Subject:* What People in 1900 Thought the Year 2000 Would Look Like
>
>
> What people in 1900 thought the year 2000 would look like
>
>
>
>
>
> By Ana Swanson <http://www.washingtonpost.com/people/ana-swanson>
>
> There are few things as fascinating as seeing what people in the past
> dreamed about the future.
>
> "France in the Year 2000" is one example. The series of paintings, made by
> Jean-Marc Côté and other French artists in 1899, 1900, 1901 and 1910, shows
> artist depictions of what life might look like in the year 2000. The first
> series of images were printed and enclosed in cigarette and cigar boxes
> around the time of the 1900 World Exhibition in Paris, according to the
> Public Domain Review
> <http://publicdomainreview.org/collections/france-in-the-year-2000-1899-1910/>,
> then later turned into postcards.
>
> *[The next 800,686 years, in sci-fi predictions
> <http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonkblog/wp/2015/08/11/the-next-800686-years-in-sci-fi-predictions/>]*
>
> Lots of their ideas involve mechanized devices, flying, or a combination
> of the two. Some, strangely, involve people interacting in a very close and
> personal way with marine life. As Open Culture points out
> <http://www.openculture.com/2015/09/how-french-artists-in-1899-envisioned-life-in-the-year-2000.html>,
> however, there are no images of space travel.
>
> *[Kurt Vonnegut graphed the world’s most popular stories
> <http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonkblog/wp/2015/02/09/kurt-vonnegut-graphed-the-worlds-most-popular-stories/>]*
>
> Some of the portraits are fantastic -- swashbucklers riding on giant
> seahorses, anyone? But others are actually surprisingly accurate visions of
> our current era, including farming machines, helicopters, and what looks
> like a precursor to the new robot vaccum, the iRobot Roomba vacuum:
>
>
> France in the Year 2000
>
> There is something vaguely familiar about these visions of mechanized
> farming, for example:
>
>
> France in the Year 2000
>
>
> France in the Year 2000
>
> Perhaps this is the precursor to the motorhome?
>
>
> France in the Year 2000
>
> However, some of the other machines didn't quite come to pass:
>
>
> France in the Year 2000
>
>
> France in the Year 2000
>
>
> France in the Year 2000
>
>
> France in the Year 2000
>
>
> France in the Year 2000
>
> The series also features a great assortment of flying machines and
> devices, including a helicopter:
>
>
> France in the Year 2000
>
> One drawing features an airship, which were being used at the time, but
> fell out of favor after the Hindenburg disaster in 1937:
>
>
> France in the Year 2000
>
> The series imagines small winged planes or devices being used by cabbies,
> postmen, police, firemen and hunters:
>
>
> France in the Year 2000
>
>
> France in the Year 2000
>
>
> France in the Year 2000
>
>
> France in the Year 2000
>
>
> France in the Year 2000
>
> Here's their conception of a "war plane" and "war cars":
>
>
> France in the Year 2000
>
>
> France in the Year 2000
>
> Strangely, the series also includes some fairly far-out examples of people
> cavorting with marine life:
>
>
> France in the Year 2000
>
>
> France in the Year 2000
>
>
> France in the Year 2000
>
>
> France in the Year 2000
>
> And finally, the "Whale bus," which really ought to be a thing by now:
>
>
> France in the Year 2000
>
>
>



-- 
I am a Statistician.  One False move and you're a Statistic.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.