Re: Your Opinion on shutting down SF-LIT

Teramis <[email protected]> Tue, 1 Nov 2016 10:11:49 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.culture.sf.literature
Message-ID <20161101101149.90dd9942635376e21088c679408a7dc5.7c2140a481.wbe@email18.secureserver.net>
Colleen:
> 
> The traffic for this listserv is very low and tends to be only one or two people posting regularly. How would the SF-LIT community feel if this listserv was to end?
> 

I've been on this list since the early '90s (mostly lurking, obviously),
and I remember when it was a much more robust forum. With the burgeoning
of the internet, many other competing fora for discussion have
flourished, and I guess most folks are getting their sf fix elselist. 

However, it is also difficult if not impossible to maintain a reasonable
level of discussion unless a list membership is relatively large. It
might be possible to promote this list in new reaches of the web, and
gather a new, larger membership that will reinvigorate discussion here.
(Maybe in conjunction with an LOC blog page/site?)

But barring an intentional recruitment effort like that, it might be
best to let the list go away. Although I am curious where else people
are having sf discussions of substance, aside from Usenet groups (some
of which remain relatively active and engaged in genre areas). I also
see good exchanges on G+ from time to time as well. 

-Teramis

Deborah Teramis Christian
Novelist