Issue 3.2 of Queer Studies in Media & Popular Culture now available
Tessa Mathieson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.studies.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAGDYkMse3awM_aD7CiJqS9TRyO0nMTF_+92YYNJqC_aYY7vMvg@mail.gmail.com> |
Intellect is happy to announce that *Queer Studies in Media & Popular Culture <https://www.intellectbooks.co.uk/journals/view-Journal,id=245/view,page=0/> *3.2 is now available. For more information about QSMPC 3.2 including how to subscribe, please click here <https://www.intellectbooks.co.uk/journals/view-issue,id=3581/> or email [email protected] Articles within this issue include (partial list): *Snatching an archive: Gay citation, queer belonging and the production of pleasure in RuPaul’s Drag Race* Authors: Michael Shetina Page Start: 143 Since its 2009 debut, RuPaul’s Drag Race (2009–present) has been a site of contact between the worlds of subcultural performance and media industries. Of particular interest to critics has been its uneasy placement of queer networks of belonging within the competitive, individualist space of a reality competition series. Building upon recent scholarship on reality television and affect, this article analyses the transfer of pleasures among RuPaul, her queens and viewers by focusing on Snatch Game, a recurring challenge in which competitors impersonate gay icons. It argues that, through these performances of queer citation, Snatch Game makes a case for the continuing importance of queer mediations of dominant culture – often in ways that are at odds with the show’s neo-liberal ethos. In doing so, Snatch Game documents not only a canon of gay icons but also the networks of pleasure and belonging fabricated through their queer circulation. *Documenting queer(ed) punk histories: Instagram, archives and ephemerality* Authors: Shoshana Rosenberg And Megan Sharp Page Start: 159 Queer(ed) bodies in punk subculture problematize deeply embedded heterosexual, cismale occupation of space and time. Traditional modes of media and documentation aid in establishing normative perspectives of who participates in punk, and how. Rather than reproducing dominant media expectations, queer people express and explore their self(s) through mediating fleeting-yet-concrete utopias that often leave only ephemeral evidence, but are picked up from the margins of scenes and media by others who know where to find them. This article examines tattooing and its intersection with Instagram digitization as forms of memorialising identity, not necessarily through the artwork of the tattoo, but rather through the praxis and application of its subject. Through a reflexive analysis of interviews with queer people who have been involved with punk, as well as the authors’ autoethnographic reflections on their own experiences as queers in punk scenes and on Instagram, this article explores tattoo practice as a means of creating affective atmospheres and embodying queer futurity. We find that tattoos act as silos for bodily and digital memory, and that their utility for queer punx generates new forms of meaning, mediation and production. *In/appropriate, ir/retrievable: Dragging out Singapore’s queer televisual archives* Authors: Liew Kai Khiun And Natasha Ismail Page Start: 175 The 2010–11 seasons of 90210 (2008–13), Degrassi (2010–15), Glee (2009–15) and Pretty Little Liars (2010–17) represent homophobia as arising from closeted teens, cisgender male ‘jocks’, racialized characters and immigrants. Rather than locating homophobia and heteronormativity within the social fabric and minds of all who have been steeped in American and Canadian hegemonic beliefs, homophobic characters are framed as rare, anachronistic and out-of-step with the seemingly post-homophobia ethos they exist within. Drawing on media trade publications, I place these patterns for representing homophobia in their market context, arguing that profit motives encourage representations of gay teens and homophobia that suggest homophobic beliefs are the domain of ‘others’, apart from the privileged viewer of teen TV: affluent, educated, female, white and non-white millennials aged 18–34. The target viewers are invited to see themselves as innocent and enlightened in relation to homophobic others, while prescribing a cure to homophobia that emphasizes individual change over social change. ===== General list info and FAQ: http://comm.umn.edu/~grodman/cultstud.html