Re: Talk of interest to visual studies folks
Darryl Wiggers <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.studies.media |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
From: Mark Freeman <[email protected]> I believe that art and politics are (often) intrinsically related. Certainly the removal of historical work by a governor objecting to the content of the art is an explicitly political act. Political speech, no matter if intemperate or offensive, should be the most protected speech, and the least subject to censorship--- even/ (especially) in the context of an academic forum. I believe that the appropriate response to characterizations and opinions that some find objectionable is more speech, not less. I would be very uncomfortable with empowering a moderator to edit remarks found to be politically motivated and/or opinionated. It's a slippery slope. In my "opinion" if we believe that Ai Wei Wei should be able to speak freely in China, we should also staunchly defend free speech and the rights of artists in our own forum, and in our own country. I would hope that protocols for moderating the H-FILM list would explicitly safeguard free speech. Mark Freeman Chair SDSU Senate Freedom of Expression Committee Professor School of Theatre, Television, and Film San Diego State University 5500 Campanile Dr. San Diego, CA 92182-7601 Ph 619 594-5497 Fax 619 594-1391 http://www.markfreemanfilms.org "Freedom of expression is the matrix, the indispensable condition, of nearly every other form of freedom." - Benjamin Nathan Cardozo MODERATOR'S NOTE: Just so the list is clear on the process, when we suggest any rewording of a post -- which is VERY rare these days -- we ONLY do so with the consent of the original author. Ultimately it's supposed to be their words -- their name is attached to them -- so such editing requires their approval. Our greatest concern, of course, is anything that is potentially libelous (but this is exceedingly rare). More generally, our concern is just to keep the discussion focused on the purpose of the list ("encourages scholarly discussion of cinema history and uses of the media"). Such discussion is not useful when it disintegrates into name-calling. "Bonehead" gets into that territory. Then it should be added, when the original author was made aware of this they agreed it was "inappropriate" and apologized for its use. Those who disagree -- and this is also rare -- have plenty of other forums at their disposal where they are free to say whatever they want. In our experience, most appreciate that H-Film endeavors to keep the discussion on-topic and civil. Again, our apologies to this list for not sorting this out beforehand.