Fwd: Reply: multiple versions (3 responses)
Kenneth Nolley <[email protected]> Wed, 24 Jul 2013 08:55:39 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.studies.media |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAA1nEoRKKqBJoC1hgiCOUzXYOEKDgTqM9-06rbqhoByFdkWgjw@mail.gmail.com> |
> That being said, I really like the thesis that films represent the structure > of feeling of the era in which they are produced far more than the era in > which they are set (this seems particularly true of westerns). From: Rodney Wallis <[email protected]> > That being said, I really like the thesis that films represent the structure > of feeling of the era in which they are produced far more than the era in > which they are set (this seems particularly true of westerns). I wholeheartedly agree with your last point. In addition to the Western, I would say that the Biblical/historical epic is another form that primarily functions as a commentary on the period in which it is produced. -- * * * * * * From: Henry M. Taylor <[email protected]> I haven't really followed this thread, but if I may make a suggestion regarding the historiography as art/science question: volume 1 of Paul Ricoeur's Time and Narrative specifically deals with this issue and why historiography is neither science nor just just another literary genre, as Hayden White would have it. Henry * * * * * * --