Fwd: Reply: multiple versions (3 responses)

Kenneth Nolley <[email protected]> Wed, 24 Jul 2013 08:55:39 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.culture.studies.media
Message-ID <CAA1nEoRKKqBJoC1hgiCOUzXYOEKDgTqM9-06rbqhoByFdkWgjw@mail.gmail.com>
>  That being said, I really like the thesis that films represent the
structure
>  of feeling of the era in which they are produced far more than the era in
>  which they are set (this seems particularly true of westerns).

From: Rodney Wallis <[email protected]>

>  That being said, I really like the thesis that films represent the
structure
>  of feeling of the era in which they are produced far more than the era in
>  which they are set (this seems particularly true of westerns).

I wholeheartedly agree with your last point. In addition to the Western, I
would say that the Biblical/historical epic is another form that primarily
functions as a commentary on the period in which it is produced.
--
* * * * * *
From: Henry M. Taylor <[email protected]>

I haven't really followed this thread, but if I may make a suggestion
regarding the historiography as art/science question: volume 1 of Paul
Ricoeur's Time and Narrative specifically deals with this issue and why
historiography is neither science nor just just another literary genre, as
Hayden White would have it.

Henry
* * * * * *

 --