Re: please ignore post about gmane.emacs.help and gmane.emacs.devel not working
Emanuel Berg <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.discuss |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: >> Now it finally worked, the forth attempt. >> >> Good :) > > It probably means that your mail was held for > manual review by the gnu.org mailing > list admins. I've been that bad? ... (?) But this post in particular was 100% on-topic even with commented and neatly looking Elisp included, with nothing to remark on whatsoever. Why don't you read it yourself! Tho I suspect you find such databases below your something something :) Actually I love seekwell and relational algebra but it doesn't always have to be like that just because it is good, because I also love _lists_ (and Elisp) and _files_, and when they are self-contained it just strikes me as so cool :) Also, isn't it original as well? I ask because some people say I only do polished stuff and combinations, and never anything original... And in this case... well yeah, it is polished, and a combination! But a little bit original as well, isn't it, the recursive twist? I think it is :) -- underground experts united http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573 https://dataswamp.org/~incal