Re: Address munging
Dmitry Alexandrov <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.discuss |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dmitry Alexandrov <[email protected]> wrote: > That is, there are such lists? > However, many (most?) of groups in question are processed for the reasons that for sure have nothing to do with the wishes of their listmasters, since they are publicly archived elsewhere, and first of all at the place of their origin. In the case there is no justification for a given group stored anywhere, could you just provide me with a table of mailing lists where munger is turned on — Iʼll classify them into those like [email protected] and those which indeed might be obfuscated intentionally and need to deal (someday, perhaps) with them on case-by-case basis.
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 247 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIMEARYIACsWIQRSX35grYEsI2F1K7TIsPhUjufz5wUCXt0row0cZGFnQGdudWku b3JnAAoJEMiw+FSO5/PnbA8BAIm7K5al5ZBMnDcLR657b6MQoi62Lx/dYMjW5InC dOSSAQCUvHIZS+SQ1ayZNz7UfV2gpD3eDNWeZa8mHetqu14oCA== =Mw1/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----