Re: Address munging vs. DKIM

Dmitry writes:

>> (I just set up Gnus to add DKIM-signature:-headers to my outgoing
>> news articles the other day

> ‘Just’!

"Just" as in "recently" rather than "easily".

>> I don't see how any NNTP client could do that out of the box

> Do you mean, that was as easy as (setq gnus-...-dkim-key "...")?

No. Read what I wrote again. "I don't see how" ...
                                  ^^^

>> I fail to see how address encryption makes the whole []/DKIM/DMARC
>> thing any worse

> By _forcing_ you to use the gateway for posting, of course.

Could you elaborate on that? I don't understand what you mean. You can
post through Gmane if you want, or you can send an email to mailing list
address if you want. I don't see how address encryption affects that
choice in any way?

The _only_ thing you can't do is to email people directly (because the
forwarding functionality doesn't work any more).

I think we are starting to go in circles now, didn't we start with this?

> (Worse than what, by the way?

Worse than address encryption turned off.

> There is absolutely nothing bad about signing your mail and with
> DKIM/DMARC in particular.

I didn't say there is.


  Best regards,

    Adam

-- 
 "our projects continue but we are clearing our             Adam Sjøgren
  store of all old items. KOMPRESSOR IS THE FUTURE.    [email protected]
  NOT THE PAST."