Re: A table of lists affected by munging, please

Dmitry writes:

> Adam Sjøgren <[email protected]> wrote:

>> Of course such a list can be made

> Oh, thatʼs nice!  Please, do a favour.

I think we've misunderstood each other.

I was answering the question of whether it technically is possible to
create such a list.

I wasn't offering to do so (it wouldn't be my decision to make, and as
you probably have guessed, if it was, I would choose not to provide it).

>> if not, how would Gmane know what lists to do address encryption on
>> and which not?

> Pardon me, if the reason behind my question was unobvious; here it is:
> I have no idea, to what extent you can be identified with Gmane, or,
> in other words, what access you have.

As I have written twice already: I don't speak for Gmane, only for
myself.

I used to help with handling subscription requests, but I can't be
"identified with Gmane", as you put it.

I'm simply spewing my own opinions, just like you. See, we do have
something in common! :-)


  Best regards,

    Adam

-- 
 "People are crazy, the world is strange"                   Adam Sjøgren
 "Things have changed"                                 [email protected]