Re: Functionality loss when saving in other formats from .abw?

Hubert Figuière <[email protected]> Sat, 19 Jan 2013 11:27:59 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.editors.abiword.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 18/01/13 07:11 PM, James Freer wrote:
> 
> [Linux xubuntu.12.04 user]
> 
> In the time i've been using Abiword i've always saved files in .abw -
> simply as that's the default setting.
> 
> More recently i've been thinking that it would be better to consider
> .doc or .odt as these can be read by the other word processor
> LO-writer - we don't have a lot of choice as a linux user.
> 
> So what do other folk use and why? Is there any functionality loss
> between these formats.

Yes there is loss. Because file format are inherently tied to the
feature and the internal data model, the translation isn't lossless. We
try to do our best, but sometime it is just not possible.

This issue isn't specific to AbiWord, and is also why AbiWord hasn't
jumped on ODT by default - this would require a good amount of work to
adapt the internal model to ODT.

> In windows i used to use an rtf word processor
> like Jarte for letters and short files when i didn't need the
> complexity of Abiword or OO-writer (as it then was).


Hub

-----------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
[email protected] with the word
unsubscribe in the message body.