Re: proposal: changes in bxeFunctions.js

Hi,

Thank you very much for the changes, everything works perfect with my
RelaxNG.

best regards
Michael


 > Hi
 >
 > Thanks for your hints. I applied some changes to the code along the way
 > you wanted it.
 >
 > See
 > http://svnweb.bitflux.ch/horde/chora/diff.php/trunk/js/bxeFunctions.js?rt=svneditor&r1=1341&r2=1347&ty=h
 >
 > for the changes I did.
 >
 > If you want to know more of what I exactly did, just ask.
 >
 > And yes, your second proposal would have been a hack :) (The first one
 > was fine). I had to use bxe_checkIsAllowedChildOfNode and I hope I did
 > it right and useful for the common case (meaning that it does respect
 > the RelaxNG definition).
 >
 > chregu

-- 
bx-editor-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.bitflux.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/bx-editor-users