Re: Feedback on building gtkdoc
David Malcolm <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.editors.conglomerate.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 2004-10-28 at 00:41 +0200, Michèle Garoche wrote: > Le 27 oct. 2004, à 22:59, Geert Stappers a écrit : > > On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 06:56:37PM +0200, Michèle Garoche wrote: > >> WARNING: No declaration for: > >> cong_eel_option_menu_get_selected_menu_item > > Once we had "eel" code, but it got dropped. IIRC I proposed adding a dependency to the "eel" library a long time ago, but the maintainers said not to (since they didn't want to make any guarantees about API stability), and that we should simply copy & paste the needed routines. There's now only a distant relationship between the stuff in eel and the stuff in the cong-eel files. > Do you mean that: > > src/cong-eel-graphic-effects.c > src/cong-eel-graphic-effects.h > src/cong-eel.c > src/cong-eel.h > > are supposed to be not in the tree (or at least never used)? They do get used, they _are_ meant to be there. > > At the moment they are listed in src/Makefile.am. By the way, > plugin-fo.c also (I don't know if this is OK or not). And also in the > 0.7.15 tarball. The file plugin-fo.c is meant to be there; it's a plugin for working with xsl-fo files, and provides a few useful hooks IIRC. The fo-* files were an attempt at a library for doing this kind of thing and it was right to remove them; they were useless. > > Michèle > <http://micmacfr.homeunix.org> > _______________________________________________ > Conglomerate-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.copyleft.no/mailman/listinfo/conglomerate-devel