Re: Removing warnings in doc
[email protected] (Geert Stappers)
| Newsgroups | gmane.editors.conglomerate.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 11:38:49AM +0100, Michèle Garoche wrote: > What do you think if I add systematically something equivalent to: > > /** > * cong_ui_hook_tree_new_sibling: > * @doc: > * @element_desc: > * > * TODO: Write me > */ > > in all source files which are in the doc and generates in warning? > > It makes not the doc more useful (i.e. the description is not very > useful), but at least there will be less warnings. > > Or is it a very bad idea? Another idea is to find how the files conglomerate-overrides.txt and conglomerate-unused.txt in doc/reference work. I guess they surpress the warnings and wouldn't polute the output. Geert Stappers _______________________________________________ Conglomerate-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.copyleft.no/mailman/listinfo/conglomerate-devel
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBi+EpOSINbgwa/7sRAiE0AJ9MGaQInQlzE3j0sBthmkX2pXW2zQCfS8kw X4QK6Yd88O/8/OaZotbwJIg= =EUqq -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----