Re: [c] removing warnings on doc

[email protected] (Geert Stappers)
Newsgroups gmane.editors.conglomerate.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 09:04:33PM +0100, Michèle Garoche wrote:
> Le 4 déc. 2004, à 20:39, Geert Stappers a écrit :
> 
> >I also see when
> >programm code could be get harmed.
> Do you mean I've done something wrong that could harm the code?

Oops, sorry.

I was talking about myself, it was an introduction to

| > But I'm not in position to judge
| > that the programmers documentation is improving.

> >Yes, adding unused declarations to the doc is fine.
> I'll try to do that.

Nice!


Cheers
Geert Stappers

_______________________________________________
Conglomerate-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.copyleft.no/mailman/listinfo/conglomerate-devel
[c]: in december will [conglomerate-devel][c] removed from the subject.
(filter on other headers then the subject line)
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBshwNOSINbgwa/7sRAl38AKCQkHaF2urwzKnsRv206iaAI87BGwCcCk7A
t4IkqTyuiXDs0qBj0NW+REY=
=UVsG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.