Re: announcing http://gtkdoc.conglomerate.org/

On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 12:43:56PM -0400, Doug Burke wrote:
Oops, three months ago
> On Sep 30, 2004, at 9:53 AM, Geert Stappers wrote:
> >On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 08:43:37AM -0400, Douglas Burke wrote:
> >>On Wed, 29 Sep 2004, Geert Stappers wrote:
  [ announce http://gtkdoc.conglomerate.org ]
> >>Would it be possible to have two versions of the documentation: one
> >>for the latest released code (which is what you have now) and one for 
> >>the CVS version?
> >
> >What are the opinions on a scheme like
> > http://gtkdoc.conglomerate.org/p.x.y/
> > http://gtkdoc.conglomerate.org/q.x.y/
> > http://gtkdoc.conglomerate.org/head/
> >?
> >
> >Where p.x.y and q.x.y. are releases of major versions
> >and head is the development version.
> >
> >>Doug
> >
> >Geert Stappers
> 
> Geert,
> 
> Your suggestion works for me but it's probably worth seeing if other 
> people would find it useful before spending any time on it :-) I guess 
> some long-term issues would be:
> 
>  - how many versions do we keep documentation for
only a few, we will see

>  - how often would the head version be updated
it is now at a stage where it can be scripted,
the plan is to refresh it daily.

> 
> Doug

Cheers
Geert Stappers

_______________________________________________
Conglomerate-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.copyleft.no/mailman/listinfo/conglomerate-devel

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFB2yAUOSINbgwa/7sRAjfHAJ9eHsZorVNgC/Qwz0VMIJBrWmo3eQCgwl2u
xHFmfFudqlyiywbPpewDLQo=
=IouG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----