Re: "easy-fix" bugzilla keyword becomes "gnome-love"

Le 11 mars 2005, à 4:05, David Malcolm a écrit :

> So if you're looking for something to get hacking on, have a look at  
> the
> query:
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/reports/keyword-search.cgi?keyword=gnome- 
> love&product=conglomerate
Among those, maybe I can have a look at this one:
<http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114672> : docbook elements  
missing.

This leads to two observations:

1 - I may add missing elements to the version of docbook used in the  
dispspecs, i.e. 4.1.2

2 - This 4.1.2 version is pretty old, current version is 4.4.
Hence not giving access to the newer elements.
How should this be handled?

a - Another dispspecs?
b - A variant on the docbook dispspec excluding obsolete elements and  
including new ones
c - Nothing at all, leaving it to the user to put the correct  
specification and to validate it?

Michèle
<http://micmacfr.homeunix.org>

_______________________________________________
Conglomerate-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.copyleft.no/mailman/listinfo/conglomerate-devel