Re: Question about faq.xml

Personally I think it would be better to keep the quandaset, I'd say
this was a bug in yelp (if it supports docbook it should support it
all). For the time being the thing to to is probably pass it through and
xslt to convert the quandaset to something more suitable.


Looking at the source for yelp 2.6 the quanda templates are marked with
FIXME, though in 2.9 it all seems to have changed so it may have been
fixed.

On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 21:49 +0200, Michèle Garoche wrote:
> Le 7 avr. 2005, à 21:29, Geert Stappers a écrit :
> > On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 01:43:15AM +0200, Michèle Garoche wrote:
> >> Now the question is:
> >> Do you mind having this version on the web site?
> >> Or do you prefer a script in the doc source to patch on the fly the 
> >> faq
> >> as it is on the web site to be further processed for displaying with
> >> yelp? (I don't suggest a patch, since it would be a nightmare each 
> >> time
> >> the faq were updated).
> >
> > both website and yelp use the same file.
> > the leading file is in the source tree  ( not in the web-site tree )
> Yes, I know that. Sorry I was not clear enough.
> I can send a patch so that the faq be integrated in the user's manual, 
> but then it will use no more quandaset, but section. Are you OK with 
> this? It means probably that the faq on the web site will not appear as 
> it is now, unless some css tags are added.
> Or do you prefer I send a script to change the faq to use sections just 
> for the user's manual, this way the web site does not need to be 
> changed?
> 
> Michèle
> <http://micmacfr.homeunix.org>
> _______________________________________________
> Conglomerate-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.copyleft.no/mailman/listinfo/conglomerate-devel
-- 
Jeff Martin

Memetic Engineer

http://www.custommonkey.org/