Re: Comparative review of XML editors

On Sat, 2005-04-30 at 13:12, Steinar Bang wrote:
> >>>>> Sean Wheller <[email protected]>:
> 
> > On Monday 25 April 2005 19:34, David Malcolm wrote:
> 
> >>> * validation is bad on complex documents
> 
> >> Do you mean that validation is wrong, or that the feature isn't
> >> usable enough (or both?).
> 
> > Well I think, I don't remember what the users exact problem was with
> > validation, but from my own experience I can validate a document
> > containing external entities or xincludes with xmllint but cannot
> > validate the same document in conglomerate.
> 
> Interesting.
> 
> conglomerate and xmllint are both based on the libxml2 library, and (I
> presume) rely on it for validation.
Yes - so that's unexpected.

If you find problems with this, please file it in Bugzilla.  It would be
great if you can isolate a minimal test case and attach it to the bug.