Re: Validation of new document based on cnxml

On Fri, 2005-05-06 at 23:54 +0200, Michèle Garoche wrote:
> Le 6 mai 2005 à 22:42, Geert Stappers a écrit :
> 
> > On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 09:41:07PM +0200, Michèle Garoche wrote:
> >
> >> Le 6 mai 2005 à 01:40, David Malcolm a écrit :
> >>
> >>> On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 16:56 +0200, Michèle Garoche wrote:
> >>>
> >
> >   <snip/>
> >
> >
> >>> (Coming back months later)
> >>> Did any of this make it into CVS (or bugzilla)?
> >>>
> >> No you rejected the patch as you wanted that someone from the cnxml
> >> team confirmed it.
> >>
> >
> > What was the response the cnxml team?
> None.

I'm afraid I've lost track of exactly what was proposed in this thread.

>From looking at "dispspecs/cnxml.xds.in" in CVS, it looks like Michèle's
proposed fixes ought now to be working.  Are they?