Re: Validation of new document based on cnxml

On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 04:02:12AM +0200, Michèle Garoche wrote:
> Le 7 mai 2005 à 03:07, David Malcolm a écrit :
  
  [ a not proper reviewed patch ]

> >I'm afraid I've lost track of exactly what was proposed in this  
> >thread.

Sorry, but here another one that lost track

> I made two propositions:
> 1 -  One for the example folder: cnxml.xml
>   a - First to change the url which was wrong, this one was integrated.
>   b - A second one to give a newer example, because the current one  
> is based on a very old version, it was never integrated.
> 
> The example validates, but does not display correctly.
> 
> 2 -  Another one for the dispspec: cnxml.xds.in
> To change the url, this was integrated.
> To provide a spec conformed to the standard, this one was not  
> integrated.
> 
> Generating a cnxml document does not work properly. It creates a non  
> validating document, because the dispspec is not conforming the  
> standard.

Could you please resend the patches?
My apology for the inconvience.

> >>From looking at "dispspecs/cnxml.xds.in" in CVS, it looks like  
> >>Michèle's
> >>
> >proposed fixes ought now to be working.  Are they?
> No, they are not, because the code should also be changed so that the  
> disspec could be honored, i.e. id allowed on all elements.
> 
> Cheers,
> Michèle
> <http://micmacfr.homeunix.org>

Cheers
Geert Stappers