Re: faq.xml.qna, yelp doesn't handle QandA

On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 05:20:10PM +0200, Sean Wheller wrote:
> On Sunday 08 May 2005 16:59, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > That will start a bugreport, severity enhencement, on yelp.
> >
> > Dave did ask us to do so.
> >
> > Don't count on me for that one.
> > Where we all have our own buzy schedule with somewhere time for
> > Conglomerate. Do we all have our reasons for not reporting the yelp
> > enhencement. Mine are that "I broke my nose when I dived into gtkdoc",
> > I have no appateit for diving in other Conglomerate related technology.
> 
> I spoke to Shaunm the Yelp maintainer. The GDP have no plans to add support 
> for qanda to yelp. They add support only for what the GDP needs. Since qanda 
> is not a need at GDP and nearly no projects supply a faq, they have little 
> motivation to add this support to yelp. I can understand there reasoning.

Yes, I understand their reasoning. Our request will cost them energy.
I leave it to their decission which subset of docbook yelp can handle.

> What I think is that we should not package FAQ with conglomerate. Only put the 
> FAQ on the Web Site.
> 
> If we must package the FAQ then lets add a transformation to the cong build 
> and ship a html file instead.
> 
> The user manual remains as XML.

I start a new thread to discuss that.


Cheers
Geert Stappers

_______________________________________________
Conglomerate-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.copyleft.no/mailman/listinfo/conglomerate-devel

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCfj7tOSINbgwa/7sRAk0jAJ4715LPfayeObCn87TXM8CCrmMzOwCfekHV
kTA1js53BguGx2qInOkKsZQ=
=ZO0C
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----