Re: Parser error of readme.xds in conglomerate 0.9.1

Michèle Garoche <[email protected]> Wed, 22 Jun 2005 20:39:58 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.editors.conglomerate.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Le 22 juin 2005 =E0 16:53, David Malcolm a =E9crit :

> On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 15:02 +0200, Mich=E8le Garoche wrote:
>
>> Le 22 juin 2005 =E0 14:16, Geert Stappers a =E9crit :
>>
>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 01:56:14PM +0200, Mich=E8le Garoche wrote:
>>>    <snip/>
>>>
>>>
>>>> 3 - Cure
>>>>
>>>> Remove the xml:lang=3D"en" part of <_description> on line 5 in
>>>> dispspecs/readme.xds.in
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Do you mean
>>>
>>> --- dispspecs/readme.xds.in     29 Dec 2004 17:30:24 -0000      1.1
>>> +++ dispspecs/readme.xds.in     22 Jun 2005 12:10:04 -0000
>>> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
>>>  <dispspec>
>>>         <metadata>
>>>                 <_name>Experimental "readme" format</_name>
>>> -               <_description xml:lang=3D"en">This is a document =
type
>>> associated with the "readme" file distributed with the
>>> initial prototype of Conglomerate.</_description>
>>> +               <_description>This is a document type associated
>>> with the "readme" file distributed with the initial prototype of
>>> Conglomerate.</_description>
>>>         </metadata>
>>>         <document-models>
>>>         </document-models>
>>>
>>>
>>> ?
>>>
>>>
>> Yes, exactly, Geerts.
>>
>
> Thanks.  Do you have CVS access yet?
Yes, I had it yesterday, thanks. But I need to get in touch with the =20
coordinator of gnome French translation and with Geerts also, to know =20=

how I should use it. I have not succeeded today in doing this, That's =20=

why I send just a mail so that you know there is a little problem here.

> Feel free to fix this in CVS (with
> a ChangeLog entry)
Can it be delayed a bit or not. If it can be delayed, I'll do it =20
within the week. Because it has also incidence on the po files =20
(namely only fr.po and en-ca.po files), and that I should learn how =20
to do it properly with CVS access.

> Note that a patch together with a justification is probably the =20
> best way
> to discuss this.
Sure, as soon as I put my cvs tree in order, I'll do it this way.

Cheers,
Mich=E8le
<http://micmacfr.homeunix.org>