Re: Switching to mono [Flame Bait]

=D0=92 =D0=92=D1=82=D1=80, 07/02/2006 =D0=B2 12:47 +0100, Mich=C3=A8le Ga=
roche =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82:
> Le 7 f=C3=A9vr. 2006 =C3=A0 12:23, Jeff Martin a =C3=A9crit :
>=20
> > Not trying to start a huge religious or anything, but I was =20
> > wondering if
> > anyone had been thinking about switching conglomerate development to
> > mono.
> First of all, is the development of conglomerate still active?
>=20
> I mean, I did not see any changes in the code since a year or so =20
> (maybe a little less). Hence I wonder if the project is really still =20
> active.
>=20
> Cheers,
> Mich=C3=A8le
> <http://micmacfr.homeunix.org>


We are still alive, we are just sleeping :)

Actually the most important problem of conglomerate is editor widget
that aren't stabilized yet. Mono won't help with this issue :) Although
it's interesting idea, we can really create more reusable code and UI
with mono but in general, there is not much sense to change everything.