Re: Re: Adding the new dispspec doesn't work

On Sat, 2004-02-07 at 15:42, Roberto Rosselli Del Turco wrote:
> Il sab, 2004-02-07 alle 15:30, Dave Malcolm ha scritto:
> > On Sat, 2004-02-07 at 11:11, Roberto Rosselli Del Turco wrote:
> > > Hi Dave,
> > > I followed your instructions but the new dispspec file is not present in
> > > /usr/local/share/conglomerate/dispspecs after make - make install. This
> > > is how I added it:
> > > 
> > > dispspec_DATA = \
> > > 	cnxml.xds \
> > > 	dispspec-template.xds \
> > > 	readme.xds \
> > > 	relax-ng.xds \
> > > 	website-layout.xds \
> > > 	website-webpage.xds \
> > > 	xsl.xds \
> > > 	teixlite.xds \
> > > 	$(dispspec_in_files:.xds.in=.xds)
> > 
> > This looks correct to me; I've done the same to the Makefile.am in CVS
> > and it works for me.  Is the Makefile being regenerated?  Is the xds
> > file there in the examples directory of the source tree?
> 
> Don't know about the "regeneration" thing (sorry :) but the file is most
> definitely there.

Aha - you're building from a tarball, not from CVS - that might be it. 
Try rerunning the "configure" script.

> 
> > > I even tried a make clean before make, but to no avail. What am I doing
> > > wrong?
> > 
> > Go to the "examples" folder and do a "make" and then a "make install" on
> > just that folder and have a look at the output; hopefully you'll spot an
> > error; otherwise post the output to this list so that we can check it's
> > sane.
> 
> Well, there isn't much output: make: Nothing to be done for `all'.

"make install" ought to have some output, I believe it always copies the
files even if they haven't changed.  So if this isn't outputting
anything there's a problem.

> 
> > (In case you didn't see the long email I sent about namespaces, be
> > warned that in CVS I've changed the dispspec DTD and the loaders, and
> > the CVS version of the xds files (including the teixlite.xds file) have
> > changed quite a lot)
> 
> That shouldn't be a problem, as I'm still using the 0.7.11 original
> tarball. But now that I think of it you said you modified the file I
> attached to the bug report somehow ...
> 
> Ciao