Re: conglomerate-0.7.1 on RH8 broke

On Mon, 2003-09-08 at 05:20, Kyle Davenport wrote:
> Hi Dave et al.
>     The build fails on Redhat 8.0 because gtk2 = 2.0.6 and does not 
> contain a function "gdk_draw_pixbuf", which didn't show up until 2.1.  
> When I substituted the "deprecated" older function:
>  gdk_pixbuf_render_to_drawable (pixbuf,
>                          window,
>                          NULL,
>                          0,
>                          0,
>                          rect->x,
>                          rect->y,
>                          gdk_pixbuf_get_width(pixbuf),
>                          gdk_pixbuf_get_height(pixbuf),
>                          GDK_RGB_DITHER_NONE,
>                          0,
>                          0);
> 
> it built and ran fine.   It is way too difficult to  upgrade all the 
> rpm's that  would be required to  understand "gdk_draw_pixbuf" , so it 
> seems  a simple configure test could anticipate this...

I've committed some code to CVS which uses your idea above for
everything (even if the gdk_draw_pixbuf is present).  Thanks for
tracking this down.

Hopefully it should now build on a "vanilla" Red Hat 8 machine; 
please can you test the CVS version and confirms this?

> 
> I tried a couple xml files.  Not at all sure where the dtd comes in.   I 
> have to "force" the load every time.  One xml file contained the usual 

If you have to force the load, it's missing a Conglomerate dispspec (a
".xds" file) describing the file format.  Currently it only knows about
the ones that come pre-packaged with Conglomerate, but we hope to allow
users to build their own soon.  Have a look in the "examples" subdir of
the code.  Clicking on "Force" builds one automatically.  You can
save/edit the resulting dispspec using options on the "Tools" menu, and
should be able to get Conglomerate to recognise it by hacking it into
examples/Makefile.am

> <!DOCTYPE detection-run SYSTEM 
> "http://kismetwireless.net/kismet-1.6.2.dtd">, but generated tons of 
> validation errors afterwards.  When I substituted the latest dtd on that 
> site, it also generated some validation errors.   Is this typical, or am 
> I doing something wrong?

I don't fully understand.  What was outputting the validation errors? 
Conglomerate, as it loaded a file, or some other program that you used
on a file which you created in Conglomerate?  Or something else?

Dave Malcolm