Re: ABCL 1.8.0
Blake McBride <[email protected]> Fri, 30 Oct 2020 09:40:07 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.editors.j.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CABwHSOs_TyF3fMZa1iekkjPiqD2Ahw4TbGTpx=eim3jP4Q04TA@mail.gmail.com> |
I'd like to add that I care far, far less about "efficiently [implement atomic memory compare and swap operations" than I do about bug fixes and ANSI CL conformance. And it still seems like a lot of work is remaining in those areas. Thanks! Blake On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 9:33 AM Blake McBride <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 6:35 AM Mark Evenson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> ABCL 1.8.0 >> >> Under the gathering storms of the Fall 2020, we are pleased to >> release ABCL 1.8.0 as the Ninth major revision of the >> implementation. >> >> This Ninth Edition of the implementation now supports building and >> running on the recently released openjdk15 platform. This release >> is intended as the last major release to support the openjdk6, >> openjdk7, and openjdk8 platforms, for with abcl-2.0.0 we intend to >> move the minimum platform to openjdk11 or better in order to >> efficiently [implement atomic memory compare and swap >> operations][github/issues/92]. >> > > My company uses JDK8 and every company I've consulted with still uses > JDK8. I have no plans to switch anytime soon and nor do any of the the > companies I've consulted with as far as I know. Rather than forcing me to > move from JDK8, your exclusion of JDK8 will simply cause me to stop > upgrading ABCL. > > According to Wikipedia, Oracle extended support of JDK8 ends in 2030. > Support for JDK11 ends in 2026. Other companies like Azul plan to support > JDK8 for many years to come. > > Is it really critical for you to drop JDK8? > > Thanks. > > Blake McBride > >